hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Dave Twardzik vs. Ed Fleming: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Ed Fleming ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1006Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#246Leads
+2.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.9Leads
+0.7Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7
#28Best league finish#6Leads
+416 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+421 ptsLeads
280Games292Leads

Career Impact Rank places Ed Fleming #246 and Dave Twardzik #1006. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/dave-twardzik/ed-fleming/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDave Twardzik95.263 · No. 1,006Ed Fleming32.310 · No. 246

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Dave Twardzik

95.263 composite · No. 1,006 all-time

Dave Twardzik's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 281976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate59.66750%29.833
Best 5No. 281976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 235.5104.70030%31.410
Best 10No. 281976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 235.5170.10020%34.020

29.833 + 31.410 + 34.020= 95.263

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 235.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Ed Fleming

32.310 composite · No. 246 all-time

Ed Fleming's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 61955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate20.00050%10.000
Best 5No. 61955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 79.535.90030%10.770
Best 10No. 61955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 301956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 79.557.70020%11.540

10.000 + 10.770 + 11.540= 32.310

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 79.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1006#246Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better59.720.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better104.735.9Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better170.157.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#868#864Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.3+2.9Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0+1.1Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+416 pts+421 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons01Better result for this metric.

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Games280292
Minutes6,9216,186

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
True shooting percentage64.0%Better result for this metric.43.6%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile63.8%Unavailable
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Field-goal percentage55.2%Better result for this metric.35.9%
Three-point percentage57.1%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage82.3%Better result for this metric.73.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.8%Unavailable
Assists per game3.4Better result for this metric.1.9
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile21.4%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.7%Unavailable
Rebounds per game2.25.2Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.6%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Dave Twardzik and Ed Fleming
MetricDave TwardzikEd Fleming
Points per game9.5Better result for this metric.8.6

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Ed Fleming ranks higher in career impact.

Dave TwardzikMetricEd Fleming
#1006Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#246Leads
+2.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.9Leads
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+416 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+421 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Dave Twardzik leads every available measure below.

Dave TwardzikMetricEd Fleming
190LeadsListed-team regular-season wins139
57.9%LeadsListed-team winning percentage38.3%
1Leads50-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Dave Twardzik leads every available measure below.

Dave TwardzikMetricEd Fleming
4LeadsPlayoff appearances1
25LeadsPlayoff games13
18LeadsTeam playoff wins6
1Finals appearances1
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dave TwardzikMetricEd Fleming
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Dave TwardzikEd FlemingPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.