hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Dee Brown vs. Walt Williams: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Dee Brown ranks higher in career impact

Dee Brown

1990–91 to 2001–02 · 12 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#533LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#562
+2.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
44.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.3
+920 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+943 ptsLeads
107.3Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better96.2Leads
+1.9Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9

Career Impact Rank places Dee Brown #533 and Walt Williams #562. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Walt Williams had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/dee-brown-brownde01/walt-williams/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDee Brown59.033 · No. 533Walt Williams60.987 · No. 562

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Dee Brown

59.033 composite · No. 533 all-time

Dee Brown's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 281992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate44.66750%22.333
Best 5No. 281992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.80030%15.240
Best 10No. 281992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 611997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1181999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1481996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1901990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2181991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate107.30020%21.460

22.333 + 15.240 + 21.460= 59.033

Walt Williams

60.987 composite · No. 562 all-time

Walt Williams's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 311998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.33350%24.167
Best 5No. 311998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate58.60030%17.580
Best 10No. 311998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 721999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1141992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1322002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1492001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1652000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate96.20020%19.240

24.167 + 17.580 + 19.240= 60.987

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#533Better result for this metric.#562
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better44.7Better result for this metric.48.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.8Better result for this metric.58.6
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better107.396.2Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#492#481Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6+3.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1+2.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9+1.9
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5+0.8Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+920 pts+943 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Games608708
Minutes16,84318,818

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
True shooting percentage52.8%53.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.7%53.7%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Field-goal percentage43.6%Better result for this metric.42.5%
Three-point percentage35.7%37.9%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage82.5%Better result for this metric.74.3%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.9%Better result for this metric.13.7%
Assists per game3.7Better result for this metric.2.3
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.5%Better result for this metric.13.3%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.1%8.5%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.63.9Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.4%Better result for this metric.1.7%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%1.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Dee Brown and Walt Williams
MetricDee BrownWalt Williams
Points per game11.111.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Dee Brown ranks higher in career impact.

Dee BrownMetricWalt Williams
#533LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#562
+2.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
+1.9Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9
+920 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+943 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Dee BrownMetricWalt Williams
477LeadsListed-team regular-season wins467
46.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage45.2%
2Leads50-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons1Leads
7LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Dee BrownMetricWalt Williams
6LeadsPlayoff appearances4
31Playoff games35Leads
14Team playoff wins18Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Dee BrownMetricWalt Williams
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Dee BrownWalt WilliamsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.