hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Denzel Valentine vs. Justin Anderson: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Justin Anderson ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2063Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1989Leads
+0.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3
-1.0Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8Leads
#134LeadsBest league finish#152
+90 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+54 pts
256LeadsGames242

Career Impact Rank places Justin Anderson #1989 and Denzel Valentine #2063. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Denzel Valentine had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/denzel-valentine/justin-anderson/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDenzel Valentine223.540 · No. 2,063Justin Anderson215.687 · No. 1,989

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Denzel Valentine

223.540 composite · No. 2,063 all-time

Denzel Valentine's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1342019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1412017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2682016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate181.00050%90.500
Best 5No. 1342019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1412017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2682016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3012020–211 open slot × No. 364241.60030%72.480
Best 10No. 1342019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1412017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2682016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3012020–216 open slots × No. 364302.80020%60.560

90.500 + 72.480 + 60.560= 223.540

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 364, this player's stored replacement finish.

Justin Anderson

215.687 composite · No. 1,989 all-time

Justin Anderson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1522015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2102017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate175.33350%87.667
Best 5No. 1522015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2102017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2532018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 365228.80030%68.640
Best 10No. 1522015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2102017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2532018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 365296.90020%59.380

87.667 + 68.640 + 59.380= 215.687

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 365, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2063#1989Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better181.0175.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better241.6228.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better302.8296.9Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1455Better result for this metric.#1612
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.4Better result for this metric.-0.3
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6-0.5Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+90 ptsBetter result for this metric.+54 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Games256242
Minutes4,8173,280

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
True shooting percentage50.7%52.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile50.2%52.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Field-goal percentage39.4%41.0%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage36.0%Better result for this metric.29.2%
Free-throw percentage78.7%Better result for this metric.77.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.8%Better result for this metric.7.4%
Assists per game1.8Better result for this metric.0.8
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.2%10.3%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.3%10.4%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.3Better result for this metric.2.6

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.8%Better result for this metric.1.7%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%2.1%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Denzel Valentine and Justin Anderson
MetricDenzel ValentineJustin Anderson
Points per game7.0Better result for this metric.5.3

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Justin Anderson ranks higher in career impact.

Denzel ValentineMetricJustin Anderson
#2063Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1989Leads
+0.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+90 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+54 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Denzel ValentineMetricJustin Anderson
214Listed-team regular-season wins288Leads
46.0%LeadsListed-team winning percentage44.6%
050-win team seasons1Leads
060-win team seasons0
2Playoff team seasons3Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Justin Anderson leads every available measure below.

Denzel ValentineMetricJustin Anderson
1Playoff appearances3Leads
4Playoff games15Leads
2Team playoff wins6Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Denzel ValentineMetricJustin Anderson
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Denzel ValentineJustin AndersonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.