hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Don Barksdale vs. Don Otten: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Don Barksdale ranks higher in career impact

Don Otten

1950–51 to 1952–53 · 3 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#487LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#840
+0.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2Leads
-0.8LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0
#39Best league finish#37Leads
+196 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+64 pts
262LeadsGames155

Career Impact Rank places Don Barksdale #487 and Don Otten #840. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Don Otten had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/don-barksdale/don-otten/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDon Barksdale55.693 · No. 487Don Otten81.273 · No. 840

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Don Barksdale

55.693 composite · No. 487 all-time

Don Barksdale's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 391952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate46.66750%23.333
Best 5No. 391952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 9058.40030%17.520
Best 10No. 391952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 9074.20020%14.840

23.333 + 17.520 + 14.840= 55.693

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 90, this player's stored replacement finish.

Don Otten

81.273 composite · No. 840 all-time

Don Otten's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 371951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841950–51Reconstructed historical estimate1 open slot × No. 101.574.16750%37.083
Best 5No. 371951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841950–51Reconstructed historical estimate3 open slots × No. 101.585.10030%25.530
Best 10No. 371951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841950–51Reconstructed historical estimate8 open slots × No. 101.593.30020%18.660

37.083 + 25.530 + 18.660= 81.273

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 101.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Don Barksdale and Don Otten
MetricDon BarksdaleDon Otten
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#487Better result for this metric.#840
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better46.7Better result for this metric.74.2
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better58.4Better result for this metric.85.1
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better74.2Better result for this metric.93.3
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Don Barksdale and Don Otten
MetricDon BarksdaleDon Otten
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1186Better result for this metric.#1564
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.0+0.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Unavailable
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+196 ptsBetter result for this metric.+64 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Don Barksdale and Don Otten
MetricDon BarksdaleDon Otten
Games262155
Minutes7,4603,667

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Don Barksdale and Don Otten
MetricDon BarksdaleDon Otten
True shooting percentage43.6%47.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Don Barksdale and Don Otten
MetricDon BarksdaleDon Otten
Field-goal percentage37.0%Better result for this metric.34.8%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage66.0%77.5%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Don Barksdale and Don Otten
MetricDon BarksdaleDon Otten
Assists per game2.1Better result for this metric.1.3

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Don Barksdale and Don Otten
MetricDon BarksdaleDon Otten
Rebounds per game8.0Better result for this metric.6.0

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Don Barksdale and Don Otten
MetricDon BarksdaleDon Otten
Points per game11.0Better result for this metric.9.5

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Don Barksdale ranks higher in career impact.

Don BarksdaleMetricDon Otten
#487LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#840
+0.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2Leads
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+196 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+64 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Don BarksdaleMetricDon Otten
114Listed-team regular-season wins139Leads
40.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage37.4%
050-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
3LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Don Barksdale leads every available measure below.

Don BarksdaleMetricDon Otten
2LeadsPlayoff appearances1
13LeadsPlayoff games3
3LeadsTeam playoff wins1
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Don BarksdaleMetricDon Otten
1All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
0All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Don BarksdaleDon OttenPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.