hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Don Chaney vs. Keith Edmonson: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Don Chaney ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#309LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2216
+2.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.8
-0.3LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.8
#18LeadsBest league finish#209
+1,057 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-39 pts
742LeadsGames87

Career Impact Rank places Don Chaney #309 and Keith Edmonson #2216. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/don-chaney/keith-edmonson/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDon Chaney38.887 · No. 309Keith Edmonson239.887 · No. 2,216

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Don Chaney

38.887 composite · No. 309 all-time

Don Chaney's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 181972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.33350%10.667
Best 5No. 181972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate29.40030%8.820
Best 10No. 181972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 431973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1081969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1981978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2041977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2171979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate97.00020%19.400

10.667 + 8.820 + 19.400= 38.887

Keith Edmonson

239.887 composite · No. 2,216 all-time

Keith Edmonson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 2091983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 250236.33350%118.167
Best 5No. 2091983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 250241.80030%72.540
Best 10No. 2091983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9 open slots × No. 250245.90020%49.180

118.167 + 72.540 + 49.180= 239.887

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 250, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#309Better result for this metric.#2216
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better21.3Better result for this metric.236.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better29.4Better result for this metric.241.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better97.0Better result for this metric.245.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#434Better result for this metric.#3956
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6Better result for this metric.-2.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1Unavailable
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Unavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,057 ptsBetter result for this metric.-39 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Games74287
Minutes17,406931

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
True shooting percentage48.5%49.5%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile46.9%54.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Field-goal percentage43.8%44.8%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage16.7%Better result for this metric.0.0%
Free-throw percentage77.6%Better result for this metric.71.9%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.1%Better result for this metric.7.5%
Assists per game2.1Better result for this metric.0.6
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.7%13.9%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.8%Better result for this metric.7.5%
Rebounds per game3.9Better result for this metric.1.5

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.5%Better result for this metric.1.9%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.0%Better result for this metric.0.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Don Chaney and Keith Edmonson
MetricDon ChaneyKeith Edmonson
Points per game8.4Better result for this metric.6.0

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Don Chaney ranks higher in career impact.

Don ChaneyMetricKeith Edmonson
#309LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2216
+2.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.8
+1.7Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+1,057 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-39 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Don ChaneyMetricKeith Edmonson
794LeadsListed-team regular-season wins118
0.6%Listed-team winning percentage48.0%Leads
9Leads50-win team seasons0
8Leads60-win team seasons0
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Don Chaney leads every available measure below.

Don ChaneyMetricKeith Edmonson
6LeadsPlayoff appearances1
70LeadsPlayoff games1
46LeadsTeam playoff wins1
2LeadsFinals appearances0
2LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Don ChaneyMetricKeith Edmonson
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
5All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Don ChaneyKeith EdmonsonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.