hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Don Ford vs. Jim Barnes: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jim Barnes ranks higher in career impact

Don Ford

1975–76 to 1981–82 · 7 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1534Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#793Leads
-0.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
-1.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.9
141.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better69.0Leads
+25 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-13 pts
193.9Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better98.7Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jim Barnes #793 and Don Ford #1534. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Don Ford had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/don-ford/jim-barnes/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDon Ford156.847 · No. 1,534Jim Barnes78.720 · No. 793

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Don Ford

156.847 composite · No. 1,534 all-time

Don Ford's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1171977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1611975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate141.33350%70.667
Best 5No. 1171977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1611975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1661978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate158.00030%47.400
Best 10No. 1171977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1611975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1661978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2071980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 235.5193.90020%38.780

70.667 + 47.400 + 38.780= 156.847

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 235.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Jim Barnes

78.720 composite · No. 793 all-time

Jim Barnes's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 531964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate69.00050%34.500
Best 5No. 531964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate81.60030%24.480
Best 10No. 531964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1051967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 11298.70020%19.740

34.500 + 24.480 + 19.740= 78.720

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 112, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1534#793Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better141.369.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better158.081.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better193.998.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1780Better result for this metric.#2968
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6Better result for this metric.-1.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2Better result for this metric.-1.4
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.8Better result for this metric.-1.9
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+25 ptsBetter result for this metric.-13 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Games474454
Minutes9,3019,455

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
True shooting percentage49.5%Better result for this metric.47.7%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile49.7%Better result for this metric.47.9%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Field-goal percentage46.4%Better result for this metric.42.9%
Three-point percentage14.3%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage77.3%Better result for this metric.68.4%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.9%Better result for this metric.5.3%
Assists per game1.4Better result for this metric.0.8
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.1%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.4%Unavailable
Rebounds per game3.66.5Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.8%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Don Ford and Jim Barnes
MetricDon FordJim Barnes
Points per game6.48.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Barnes ranks higher in career impact.

Don FordMetricJim Barnes
#1534Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#793Leads
-0.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
-1.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.9
+25 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-13 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Don FordMetricJim Barnes
367Listed-team regular-season wins813Leads
1.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
350-win team seasons10Leads
260-win team seasons10Leads
4Playoff team seasons6Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Don Ford leads every available measure below.

Don FordMetricJim Barnes
3Playoff appearances3
20LeadsPlayoff games11
8LeadsTeam playoff wins1
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Don FordMetricJim Barnes
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Don FordJim BarnesPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.