hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Draymond Green vs. Gerald Wallace: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Draymond Green ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#198LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#201
+5.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.3Leads
+3.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.1Leads
17.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better15.3Leads
+2,338 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,007 pts
1LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0

Career Impact Rank places Draymond Green #198 and Gerald Wallace #201. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Gerald Wallace had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/draymond-green/gerald-wallace/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedDraymond Green26.280 · No. 198Gerald Wallace26.407 · No. 201

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Draymond Green

26.280 composite · No. 198 all-time

Draymond Green's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 102015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate17.00050%8.500
Best 5No. 102015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 512021–2226.80030%8.040
Best 10No. 102015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 172016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 242014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 322017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 512021–22No. 562023–24No. 602013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 672018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 832019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 872020–2148.70020%9.740

8.500 + 8.040 + 9.740= 26.280

Gerald Wallace

26.407 composite · No. 201 all-time

Gerald Wallace's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 112005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 162008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.33350%7.667
Best 5No. 112005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 162008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 362007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.40030%6.420
Best 10No. 112005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 162008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 192006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 362007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 502010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 642004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1332012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1822013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate61.60020%12.320

7.667 + 6.420 + 12.320= 26.407

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#198Better result for this metric.#201
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better17.015.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better26.821.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.7Better result for this metric.61.6
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#141Better result for this metric.#178
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.1+6.3Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.5+4.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.8+4.1Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Better result for this metric.+2.5
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,338 ptsBetter result for this metric.+2,007 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons1Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Games949832
Minutes27,15124,731

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
True shooting percentage54.1%54.9%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.2%55.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Field-goal percentage44.7%46.9%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage32.1%Better result for this metric.31.2%
Free-throw percentage71.0%Better result for this metric.70.9%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile26.9%Better result for this metric.12.1%
Assists per game5.6Better result for this metric.2.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile22.9%15.1%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.2%Better result for this metric.11.2%
Rebounds per game6.8Better result for this metric.5.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%2.6%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.9%Better result for this metric.2.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Draymond Green and Gerald Wallace
MetricDraymond GreenGerald Wallace
Points per game8.711.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Draymond Green ranks higher in career impact so far.

Draymond GreenMetricGerald Wallace
#198LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#201
+5.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.3Leads
+3.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.1Leads
+2,338 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,007 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Draymond Green leads every available measure below.

Draymond GreenMetricGerald Wallace
702LeadsListed-team regular-season wins609
62.6%LeadsListed-team winning percentage47.6%
7Leads50-win team seasons3
3Leads60-win team seasons1
10LeadsPlayoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Draymond Green leads every available measure below.

Draymond GreenMetricGerald Wallace
10LeadsPlayoff appearances7
169LeadsPlayoff games33
113LeadsTeam playoff wins29
6LeadsFinals appearances0
4LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Draymond Green leads every available measure below.

Draymond GreenMetricGerald Wallace
4LeadsAll-Star1
0MVP0
2LeadsAll-NBA0
9LeadsAll-Defense1
1LeadsDPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Draymond GreenGerald WallacePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.