hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ed Manning vs. Pat Cummings: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Ed Manning ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1071LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1699
-0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5
-1.9LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.7
#79LeadsBest league finish#155
+36 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-175 pts
280Games683Leads

Career Impact Rank places Ed Manning #1071 and Pat Cummings #1699. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/ed-manning/pat-cummings/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedEd Manning101.680 · No. 1,071Pat Cummings175.460 · No. 1,699

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Ed Manning

101.680 composite · No. 1,071 all-time

Ed Manning's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 791970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1021968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate89.00050%44.500
Best 5No. 791970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1021968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 139108.20030%32.460
Best 10No. 791970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1021968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 139123.60020%24.720

44.500 + 32.460 + 24.720= 101.680

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 139, this player's stored replacement finish.

Pat Cummings

175.460 composite · No. 1,699 all-time

Pat Cummings's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1551979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate167.00050%83.500
Best 5No. 1551979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1801984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate173.00030%51.900
Best 10No. 1551979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1801984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1881980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2301988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2361987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2391981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2451986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate200.30020%40.060

83.500 + 51.900 + 40.060= 175.460

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1071Better result for this metric.#1699
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better89.0Better result for this metric.167.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better108.2Better result for this metric.173.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better123.6Better result for this metric.200.3
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1715Better result for this metric.#4686
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Better result for this metric.-1.5
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.4Better result for this metric.-1.6
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-1.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-2.7
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+36 ptsBetter result for this metric.-175 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Games280683
Minutes4,01314,516

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
True shooting percentage45.5%53.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile45.3%53.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Field-goal percentage42.3%49.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable0.0%
Free-throw percentage70.2%73.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.7%7.9%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game0.71.2Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable16.3%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.5%14.8%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.55.6Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ed Manning and Pat Cummings
MetricEd ManningPat Cummings
Points per game5.19.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Ed Manning ranks higher in career impact.

Ed ManningMetricPat Cummings
#1071LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1699
-0.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7
+36 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-175 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ed ManningMetricPat Cummings
410Listed-team regular-season wins441Leads
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage44.8%Leads
5Leads50-win team seasons3
5Leads60-win team seasons1
3Playoff team seasons6Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Pat Cummings leads every available measure below.

Ed ManningMetricPat Cummings
2Playoff appearances5Leads
6Playoff games30Leads
1Team playoff wins13Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ed ManningMetricPat Cummings
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Ed ManningPat CummingsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.