hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Em Bryant vs. Tony Snell: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Em Bryant ranks higher in career impact

Em Bryant

1964–65 to 1971–72 · 8 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#774LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2237
-0.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
-1.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.4
67.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better229.0
+19 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+11 pts
101.5LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better279.9

Career Impact Rank places Em Bryant #774 and Tony Snell #2237. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/em-bryant/tony-snell/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedEm Bryant77.713 · No. 774Tony Snell241.700 · No. 2,237

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Em Bryant

77.713 composite · No. 774 all-time

Em Bryant's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 521965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate67.66750%33.833
Best 5No. 521965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate78.60030%23.580
Best 10No. 521965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1091967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1101968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1461971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 128.5101.50020%20.300

33.833 + 23.580 + 20.300= 77.713

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 128.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Tony Snell

241.700 composite · No. 2,237 all-time

Tony Snell's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 2212018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2432020–21229.00050%114.500
Best 5No. 2212018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2432020–21No. 2442013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2562014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate237.40030%71.220
Best 10No. 2212018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2232016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2432020–21No. 2442013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2562014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2602019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2872017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3382015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3622021–221 open slot × No. 365279.90020%55.980

114.500 + 71.220 + 55.980= 241.700

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 365, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#774Better result for this metric.#2237
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better67.7Better result for this metric.229.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better78.6Better result for this metric.237.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better101.5Better result for this metric.279.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1836Better result for this metric.#1900
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8Better result for this metric.-1.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9Better result for this metric.-1.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3Better result for this metric.-1.4
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+19 ptsBetter result for this metric.+11 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Games566601
Minutes11,45113,093

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
True shooting percentage45.1%56.7%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile45.2%57.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Field-goal percentage41.0%43.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable39.4%
Free-throw percentage69.0%84.6%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.3%Better result for this metric.7.3%
Assists per game3.0Better result for this metric.1.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable9.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.3%6.0%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.8Better result for this metric.2.3

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.0%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.9%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Em Bryant and Tony Snell
MetricEm BryantTony Snell
Points per game6.6Better result for this metric.6.1

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Em Bryant ranks higher in career impact.

Em BryantMetricTony Snell
#774LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2237
-0.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
-1.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.4
+19 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+11 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Em BryantMetricTony Snell
651LeadsListed-team regular-season wins410
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage51.6%Leads
8Leads50-win team seasons2
8Leads60-win team seasons1
3Playoff team seasons7Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Em BryantMetricTony Snell
3Playoff appearances6Leads
27Playoff games47Leads
15Team playoff wins32Leads
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Em BryantMetricTony Snell
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Em BryantTony SnellPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.