hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Eric Money vs. Fred Jones: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Eric Money ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1250LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1703
+0.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
-1.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7Leads
97.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better152.3
+161 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+189 ptsLeads
177.1LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better244.2

Career Impact Rank places Eric Money #1250 and Fred Jones #1703. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Fred Jones had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/eric-money/fred-jones/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedEric Money122.020 · No. 1,250Fred Jones175.947 · No. 1,703

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Eric Money

122.020 composite · No. 1,250 all-time

Eric Money's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 651975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate97.00050%48.500
Best 5No. 651975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate127.00030%38.100
Best 10No. 651975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2121979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 231177.10020%35.420

48.500 + 38.100 + 35.420= 122.020

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 231, this player's stored replacement finish.

Fred Jones

175.947 composite · No. 1,703 all-time

Fred Jones's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1232003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1402004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1942005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate152.33350%76.167
Best 5No. 1232003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1402004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1942005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1942008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1982007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate169.80030%50.940
Best 10No. 1232003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1402004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1942005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1942008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1982007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2572006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 334244.20020%48.840

76.167 + 50.940 + 48.840= 175.947

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 334, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1250Better result for this metric.#1703
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better97.0Better result for this metric.152.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better127.0Better result for this metric.169.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better177.1Better result for this metric.244.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1266#1206Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.0+0.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2Better result for this metric.-0.4
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2-0.7Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+161 pts+189 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Games426430
Minutes10,82710,299

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
True shooting percentage52.5%53.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.0%53.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Field-goal percentage49.4%Better result for this metric.41.1%
Three-point percentageUnavailable35.3%
Free-throw percentage74.8%80.9%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile21.3%Better result for this metric.15.9%
Assists per game3.8Better result for this metric.2.3
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.8%14.6%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.4%5.4%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.12.2Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.1%Better result for this metric.1.8%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%0.8%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Eric Money and Fred Jones
MetricEric MoneyFred Jones
Points per game12.2Better result for this metric.7.5

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Eric Money ranks higher in career impact.

Eric MoneyMetricFred Jones
#1250LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1703
+0.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
-1.2Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7Leads
+161 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+189 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Eric MoneyMetricFred Jones
405LeadsListed-team regular-season wins315
1.0%Listed-team winning percentage48.0%Leads
3Leads50-win team seasons1
2Leads60-win team seasons1
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Fred Jones leads every available measure below.

Eric MoneyMetricFred Jones
3Playoff appearances3
20Playoff games33Leads
10Team playoff wins18Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Eric MoneyMetricFred Jones
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Eric MoneyFred JonesPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.