hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Eric Paschall vs. John Hummer: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

John Hummer ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2707Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1384Leads
-1.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
-2.2LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.0
#225Best league finish#115Leads
+8 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-98 pts
158Games327Leads

Career Impact Rank places John Hummer #1384 and Eric Paschall #2707. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Eric Paschall had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/eric-paschall/john-hummer/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedEric Paschall305.867 · No. 2,707John Hummer138.233 · No. 1,384

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Eric Paschall

305.867 composite · No. 2,707 all-time

Eric Paschall's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 2252019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2872021–22No. 3382020–21283.33350%141.667
Best 5No. 2252019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2872021–22No. 3382020–212 open slots × No. 370318.00030%95.400
Best 10No. 2252019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2872021–22No. 3382020–217 open slots × No. 370344.00020%68.800

141.667 + 95.400 + 68.800= 305.867

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 370, this player's stored replacement finish.

John Hummer

138.233 composite · No. 1,384 all-time

John Hummer's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1151973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate125.66750%62.833
Best 5No. 1151973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1611971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1871974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate145.00030%43.500
Best 10No. 1151973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1611971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1871974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 174159.50020%31.900

62.833 + 43.500 + 31.900= 138.233

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 174, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2707#1384Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better283.3125.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better318.0145.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better344.0159.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1928Better result for this metric.#4502
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2-1.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.2-1.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-3.0
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+8 ptsBetter result for this metric.-98 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Games158327
Minutes3,0867,420

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
True shooting percentage57.7%Better result for this metric.46.5%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile58.1%Better result for this metric.44.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Field-goal percentage49.4%Better result for this metric.43.8%
Three-point percentage32.6%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage75.8%Better result for this metric.52.4%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.4%Better result for this metric.9.7%
Assists per game1.41.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.5%Better result for this metric.23.7%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.9%10.7%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game3.25.3Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.8%0.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.7%0.8%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Eric Paschall and John Hummer
MetricEric PaschallJohn Hummer
Points per game9.8Better result for this metric.6.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

John Hummer ranks higher in career impact.

Eric PaschallMetricJohn Hummer
#2707Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1384Leads
-1.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.0
+8 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-98 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Eric PaschallMetricJohn Hummer
103Listed-team regular-season wins574Leads
47.0%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
050-win team seasons7Leads
060-win team seasons7Leads
1Playoff team seasons3Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

John Hummer leads every available measure below.

Eric PaschallMetricJohn Hummer
1Playoff appearances2Leads
4Playoff games9Leads
2Team playoff wins6Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Eric PaschallMetricJohn Hummer
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Eric PaschallJohn HummerPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.