hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ernie Vandeweghe vs. George Ratkovicz: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Ernie Vandeweghe ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#300LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#319
+2.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6
+1.7LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2
#7LeadsBest league finish#19
+301 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+369 ptsLeads
182Games281Leads

Career Impact Rank places Ernie Vandeweghe #300 and George Ratkovicz #319. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. George Ratkovicz had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/ernie-vandeweghe/george-ratkovicz/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedErnie Vandeweghe38.047 · No. 300George Ratkovicz40.043 · No. 319

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Ernie Vandeweghe

38.047 composite · No. 300 all-time

Ernie Vandeweghe's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 71952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261950–51Reconstructed historical estimate17.33350%8.667
Best 5No. 71952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261950–51Reconstructed historical estimate2 open slots × No. 9749.20030%14.760
Best 10No. 71952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 191951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261950–51Reconstructed historical estimate7 open slots × No. 9773.10020%14.620

8.667 + 14.760 + 14.620= 38.047

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 97, this player's stored replacement finish.

George Ratkovicz

40.043 composite · No. 319 all-time

George Ratkovicz's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 191950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 191952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.66750%10.833
Best 5No. 191950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 191952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 96.548.90030%14.670
Best 10No. 191950–51Reconstructed historical estimateNo. 191952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 96.572.70020%14.540

10.833 + 14.670 + 14.540= 40.043

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 96.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Ernie Vandeweghe and George Ratkovicz
MetricErnie VandewegheGeorge Ratkovicz
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#300Better result for this metric.#319
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better17.3Better result for this metric.21.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better49.248.9Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better73.172.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ernie Vandeweghe and George Ratkovicz
MetricErnie VandewegheGeorge Ratkovicz
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1008#924Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Better result for this metric.+1.6
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Better result for this metric.+1.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+301 pts+369 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons1Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ernie Vandeweghe and George Ratkovicz
MetricErnie VandewegheGeorge Ratkovicz
Games182281
Minutes4,6068,196

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ernie Vandeweghe and George Ratkovicz
MetricErnie VandewegheGeorge Ratkovicz
True shooting percentage48.0%Better result for this metric.45.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ernie Vandeweghe and George Ratkovicz
MetricErnie VandewegheGeorge Ratkovicz
Field-goal percentage42.1%Better result for this metric.37.2%
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage76.0%Better result for this metric.69.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ernie Vandeweghe and George Ratkovicz
MetricErnie VandewegheGeorge Ratkovicz
Assists per game2.6Better result for this metric.2.4

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ernie Vandeweghe and George Ratkovicz
MetricErnie VandewegheGeorge Ratkovicz
Rebounds per game4.66.9Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ernie Vandeweghe and George Ratkovicz
MetricErnie VandewegheGeorge Ratkovicz
Points per game9.4Better result for this metric.9.3

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Ernie Vandeweghe ranks higher in career impact.

Ernie VandewegheMetricGeorge Ratkovicz
#300LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#319
+2.7LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+301 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+369 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Ernie Vandeweghe leads every available measure below.

Ernie VandewegheMetricGeorge Ratkovicz
199LeadsListed-team regular-season wins162
57.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage38.8%
050-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons3

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Ernie Vandeweghe leads every available measure below.

Ernie VandewegheMetricGeorge Ratkovicz
3LeadsPlayoff appearances2
39LeadsPlayoff games13
22LeadsTeam playoff wins7
3LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ernie VandewegheMetricGeorge Ratkovicz
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Ernie VandewegheGeorge RatkoviczPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.