hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Gar Heard vs. Maurice Lucas: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Gar Heard ranks higher in career impact

Gar Heard

1970–71 to 1980–81 · 11 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#544LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#717
+1.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9
+0.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6Leads
50.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better62.3
+867 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+907 ptsLeads
83.0LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better103.2

Career Impact Rank places Gar Heard #544 and Maurice Lucas #717. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Maurice Lucas had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/gar-heard/maurice-lucas/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGar Heard59.480 · No. 544Maurice Lucas73.167 · No. 717

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Gar Heard

59.480 composite · No. 544 all-time

Gar Heard's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 451977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.00050%25.000
Best 5No. 451977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate59.60030%17.880
Best 10No. 451977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 881980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1221970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate83.00020%16.600

25.000 + 17.880 + 16.600= 59.480

Maurice Lucas

73.167 composite · No. 717 all-time

Maurice Lucas's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 601978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate62.33350%31.167
Best 5No. 601978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate71.20030%21.360
Best 10No. 601978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1261980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1381984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1861986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate103.20020%20.640

31.167 + 21.360 + 20.640= 73.167

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#544Better result for this metric.#717
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.0Better result for this metric.62.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better59.6Better result for this metric.71.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better83.0Better result for this metric.103.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#524#500Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Better result for this metric.+0.9
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8+0.8
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5+0.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Better result for this metric.-0.1
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+867 pts+907 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Games787855
Minutes19,57124,787

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
True shooting percentage44.7%52.3%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile44.7%52.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Field-goal percentage41.4%47.3%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage0.0%11.1%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage65.4%76.3%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.1%11.9%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.62.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.4%Better result for this metric.15.1%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.4%16.7%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game7.58.8Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%Better result for this metric.1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.5%Better result for this metric.1.3%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Gar Heard and Maurice Lucas
MetricGar HeardMaurice Lucas
Points per game8.714.4Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Gar Heard ranks higher in career impact.

Gar HeardMetricMaurice Lucas
#544LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#717
+1.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9
+0.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6Leads
+867 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+907 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Gar HeardMetricMaurice Lucas
880LeadsListed-team regular-season wins565
0.6%Listed-team winning percentage53.0%Leads
10Leads50-win team seasons4
8Leads60-win team seasons1
8Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Maurice Lucas leads every available measure below.

Gar HeardMetricMaurice Lucas
7Playoff appearances9Leads
59Playoff games82Leads
30Team playoff wins43Leads
1Finals appearances1
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Gar HeardMetricMaurice Lucas
Not availableAll-Star4
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA1
Not availableAll-Defense2
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Gar HeardMaurice LucasPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.