hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Gary Harris vs. Jordan Clarkson: 2025–26 season

hussEyquation2025–26 season · regular-season impact
Regular-season verdict

Gary Harris leads in impact for 2025–26

Gary Harris ranks ahead of Jordan Clarkson in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.

Impact comparison

Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.

-0.0LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7
#268LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#360
-0.09LeadsEstimated defensive impactSelected-season lineup estimate · points per 100 possessions-0.65
-1.32Estimated offensive impactSelected-season lineup estimate · points per 100 possessions+0.02Leads
2.0%LeadsSteal rate1.2%
15.0%Turnover rateLower is better; compare alongside offensive workload10.0%Leads
8.5%Offensive usage21.1%
59.3%LeadsTrue shooting %54.8%
9.9%Assist rateShare of teammates’ made shots assisted while on court10.7%Leads
5.2%Rebound rateShare of available rebounds collected while on court5.6%Leads
48Games72
661Minutes1,279

Gary Harris's estimated impact per 100 possessions was -0.0, compared with -0.7 for Jordan Clarkson. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2025–26 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.

Gary Harris: 48 games and 661 minutes. Jordan Clarkson: 72 games and 1,279 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.

Jordan Clarkson ended a larger share of his team’s possessions, so the turnover rates are not an equal-workload comparison. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

2025–26 season · regular-season impacthusseyquation.com/compare/gary-harris/jordan-clarkson/2025-26

Behind the estimate

Why the model rates them this way

The model starts with each player’s recorded individual stats, then adjusts that estimate using lineup results. The first two rows add up to the final estimate. All figures are points per 100 possessions.

Gary HarrisMetricJordan Clarkson
-0.10LeadsFrom recorded individual stats-0.78
+0.10LeadsAdjustment from recent lineup results+0.04
-0.00LeadsFinal estimated impact-0.75

Lineup evidence: Gary Harris — 3 seasons; Jordan Clarkson — 3 seasons. This adjustment is not necessarily based on the selected season alone.

Offensive and defensive lineup estimates for the selected season

These selected-season estimates account for who played alongside and against each player. Positive means better than average; a positive defensive figure means fewer points allowed. They are separate estimates—not additional points added to the calculation above. They do not measure how much individual teammates improved.

Gary HarrisMetricJordan Clarkson
-1.32Adjusted offensive impact+0.02Leads
-0.09LeadsAdjusted defensive impact-0.65

What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.

Share this comparisonSocial card: every summary row. Link preview: six key figures.

Full comparison · 2025–26 season

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.

Impact: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Better result for this metric.-0.7
Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#268Better result for this metric.#360
From recorded individual stats-0.10Better result for this metric.-0.78
Adjustment from recent lineup results+0.10Better result for this metric.+0.04

Gary Harris: 3 seasons of lineup evidence. Jordan Clarkson: 3 seasons of lineup evidence. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.

Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Final estimated impact-0.00Better result for this metric.-0.75

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Games4872
Minutes6611,279
Offensive usage8.5%21.1%

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
True shooting percentage59.3%Better result for this metric.54.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Field-goal percentage44.2%45.1%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage41.2%Better result for this metric.32.7%
Free-throw percentage88.9%Better result for this metric.83.0%
Three-point attempt rateShare of field-goal attempts taken from three; describes shot selection, not quality65.4%40.7%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Assist rateShare of teammates’ made shots assisted while on court9.9%10.7%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.11.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Turnover rateLower is better; compare alongside offensive workload15.0%10.0%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Rebound rateShare of available rebounds collected while on court5.2%5.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game1.31.8Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Steal rate2.0%Better result for this metric.1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Block rateShare of opponents’ two-point attempts blocked while on court1.4%Better result for this metric.0.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Points per game2.78.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Selected-season adjusted lineup estimates

These account for who played alongside and against each player. Positive defense means fewer points allowed. They are separate from the observed results and are not additional points added to the model calculation.

Adjusted lineup estimates: Gary Harris and Jordan Clarkson
MetricGary HarrisJordan Clarkson
Adjusted offensive impact-1.32+0.02Better result for this metric.
Adjusted defensive impact-0.09Better result for this metric.-0.65

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Gary Harris leads in impact for 2025–26.

Gary HarrisMetricJordan Clarkson
-0.0LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7
#268LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#360

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Gary HarrisMetricJordan Clarkson
493LeadsListed-team regular-season wins470
47.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage42.3%
150-win team seasons3Leads
060-win team seasons0
5Playoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Jordan Clarkson leads every available measure below.

Gary HarrisMetricJordan Clarkson
4Playoff appearances5Leads
39Playoff games61Leads
20Team playoff wins39Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Gary HarrisMetricJordan Clarkson
Not availableAll-Star0
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Selected seasons

Box impact

Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.

Gary HarrisJordan Clarkson

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

1
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.