hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Gary Trent vs. Mike Scott: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Gary Trent ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1425LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1792
+1.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6
111.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better154.7
+147 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+88 pts
221.5LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better268.9

Career Impact Rank places Gary Trent #1425 and Mike Scott #1792. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/gary-trent/mike-scott/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGary Trent142.880 · No. 1,425Mike Scott187.513 · No. 1,792

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Gary Trent

142.880 composite · No. 1,425 all-time

Gary Trent's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 641998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1222002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate111.00050%55.500
Best 5No. 641998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1222002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1731997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2122001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate143.60030%43.080
Best 10No. 641998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1222002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1471996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1731997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2122001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2541995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2832003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 320221.50020%44.300

55.500 + 43.080 + 44.300= 142.880

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 320, this player's stored replacement finish.

Mike Scott

187.513 composite · No. 1,792 all-time

Mike Scott's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1082015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1552014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2012013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate154.66750%77.333
Best 5No. 1082015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1552014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2012013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2222019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2542017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate188.00030%56.400
Best 10No. 1082015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1552014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2012013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2222019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2542017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3262020–21No. 3282018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 365268.90020%53.780

77.333 + 56.400 + 53.780= 187.513

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 365, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1425Better result for this metric.#1792
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better111.0Better result for this metric.154.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better143.6Better result for this metric.188.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better221.5Better result for this metric.268.9
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1302Better result for this metric.#1461
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Better result for this metric.+0.7
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3Better result for this metric.-0.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Better result for this metric.-0.6
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+147 ptsBetter result for this metric.+88 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Games506555
Minutes9,8669,182

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
True shooting percentage53.1%55.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.4%55.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Field-goal percentage50.1%Better result for this metric.45.3%
Three-point percentage8.0%36.2%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage64.3%75.7%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.8%Better result for this metric.8.3%
Assists per game1.0Better result for this metric.0.9
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.7%9.1%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.2%Better result for this metric.10.1%
Rebounds per game4.5Better result for this metric.3.1

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%Better result for this metric.1.0%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%Better result for this metric.0.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Gary Trent and Mike Scott
MetricGary TrentMike Scott
Points per game8.6Better result for this metric.6.7

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Gary Trent ranks higher in career impact.

Gary TrentMetricMike Scott
#1425LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1792
+1.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6
+147 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+88 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Gary TrentMetricMike Scott
426Listed-team regular-season wins467Leads
54.1%Listed-team winning percentage58.3%Leads
4Leads50-win team seasons2
060-win team seasons1Leads
7Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Mike Scott leads every available measure below.

Gary TrentMetricMike Scott
5Playoff appearances8Leads
28Playoff games57Leads
15Team playoff wins33Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Gary TrentMetricMike Scott
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Gary TrentMike ScottPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.