hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

George King vs. Ron Lee: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

George King ranks higher in career impact

Ron Lee

1976–77 to 1981–82 · 6 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#182LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#884
+1.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4Leads
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6
18.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better57.3
+816 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+491 pts
45.5LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better156.4

Career Impact Rank places George King #182 and Ron Lee #884. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Ron Lee had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/george-king-kingge01/ron-lee/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGeorge King24.280 · No. 182Ron Lee84.787 · No. 884

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

George King

24.280 composite · No. 182 all-time

George King's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 141951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate18.00050%9.000
Best 5No. 141951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate20.60030%6.180
Best 10No. 141951–52Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201952–53Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 201953–54Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231954–55Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 261955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 8145.50020%9.100

9.000 + 6.180 + 9.100= 24.280

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 81, this player's stored replacement finish.

Ron Lee

84.787 composite · No. 884 all-time

Ron Lee's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 291977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate57.33350%28.667
Best 5No. 291977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1201981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1221979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate82.80030%24.840
Best 10No. 291977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1201981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1221979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 241.5156.40020%31.280

28.667 + 24.840 + 31.280= 84.787

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 241.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#182Better result for this metric.#884
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better18.0Better result for this metric.57.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better20.6Better result for this metric.82.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better45.5Better result for this metric.156.4
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#548Better result for this metric.#780
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8+2.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3+1.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0Better result for this metric.+0.6
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+816 ptsBetter result for this metric.+491 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Games411448
Minutes13,4089,586

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
True shooting percentage44.1%46.6%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable46.0%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Field-goal percentage38.2%41.6%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailable32.1%
Free-throw percentage64.2%70.5%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable23.3%
Assists per game4.8Better result for this metric.3.8
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable24.6%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable6.8%
Rebounds per game3.9Better result for this metric.2.7

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable4.0%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable0.7%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: George King and Ron Lee
MetricGeorge KingRon Lee
Points per game10.3Better result for this metric.7.3

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

George King ranks higher in career impact.

George KingMetricRon Lee
#182LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#884
+1.8Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.4Leads
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6
+816 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+491 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

George KingMetricRon Lee
240Listed-team regular-season wins285Leads
56.5%LeadsListed-team winning percentage43.4%
050-win team seasons2Leads
060-win team seasons0
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons3

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

George King leads every available measure below.

George KingMetricRon Lee
6LeadsPlayoff appearances1
39LeadsPlayoff games2
20LeadsTeam playoff wins0
2LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

George KingMetricRon Lee
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
George KingRon LeePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.