hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

George Lynch vs. Jerami Grant: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

George Lynch ranks higher in career impact so far

Jerami Grant

2014–15 to 2025–26 · 12 seasons · active

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#801LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1154
+1.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Leads
+1.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8
65.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better95.0
+684 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+864 ptsLeads
119.6LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better150.7

Career Impact Rank places George Lynch #801 and Jerami Grant #1154. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Jerami Grant had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/george-lynch/jerami-grant/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedGeorge Lynch79.313 · No. 801Jerami Grant110.280 · No. 1,154

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

George Lynch

79.313 composite · No. 801 all-time

George Lynch's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 591993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 722002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate65.66750%32.833
Best 5No. 591993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 722002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate75.20030%22.560
Best 10No. 591993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 661996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 722002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 801999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1001997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1342000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1831994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1882003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2151995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate119.60020%23.920

32.833 + 22.560 + 23.920= 79.313

Jerami Grant

110.280 composite · No. 1,154 all-time

Jerami Grant's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 752021–22No. 992020–21No. 1112023–2495.00050%47.500
Best 5No. 752021–22No. 992020–21No. 1112023–24No. 1292017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1302018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate108.80030%32.640
Best 10No. 752021–22No. 992020–21No. 1112023–24No. 1292017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1302018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1522022–23No. 1532019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1932015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2222016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2432025–26150.70020%30.140

47.500 + 32.640 + 30.140= 110.280

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#801Better result for this metric.#1154
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better65.7Better result for this metric.95.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better75.2Better result for this metric.108.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better119.6Better result for this metric.150.7
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#635#526Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5+1.7Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Better result for this metric.+1.2
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1Better result for this metric.+0.8
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2+0.2
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+684 pts+864 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Games774776
Minutes17,68321,749

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
True shooting percentage49.0%56.8%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile49.4%57.5%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Field-goal percentage44.6%44.9%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage30.6%36.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage65.2%75.9%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.1%Better result for this metric.9.2%
Assists per game1.41.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.3%9.8%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.6%Better result for this metric.7.7%
Rebounds per game5.0Better result for this metric.3.9

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.5%Better result for this metric.1.1%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%3.0%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: George Lynch and Jerami Grant
MetricGeorge LynchJerami Grant
Points per game6.613.5Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

George Lynch ranks higher in career impact so far.

George LynchMetricJerami Grant
#801LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1154
+1.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.7Leads
+1.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8
+684 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+864 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

George Lynch leads every available measure below.

George LynchMetricJerami Grant
450LeadsListed-team regular-season wins421
47.3%LeadsListed-team winning percentage40.2%
2Leads50-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
8LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

George Lynch leads every available measure below.

George LynchMetricJerami Grant
8LeadsPlayoff appearances5
62LeadsPlayoff games40
35LeadsTeam playoff wins14
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

George LynchMetricJerami Grant
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
George LynchJerami GrantPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.