hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Ivica Zubac vs. Otto Moore: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Otto Moore ranks higher in career impact so far

Illustrated portrait of NBA player Ivica Zubac

Ivica Zubac

2016–17 to 2025–26 · 10 seasons · active

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1162Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#513Leads
+2.2LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6
+0.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5
87.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better47.0Leads
+660 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+719 ptsLeads
169.9Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better87.0Leads

Career Impact Rank places Otto Moore #513 and Ivica Zubac #1162. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Ivica Zubac had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/ivica-zubac/otto-moore/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedIvica Zubac111.080 · No. 1,162Otto Moore57.580 · No. 513

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Ivica Zubac

111.080 composite · No. 1,162 all-time

Ivica Zubac's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 652019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 672024–25No. 1292025–2687.00050%43.500
Best 5No. 652019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 672024–25No. 1292025–26No. 1312021–22No. 1682023–24112.00030%33.600
Best 10No. 652019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 672024–25No. 1292025–26No. 1312021–22No. 1682023–24No. 1752020–21No. 1782018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1842016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2302022–231 open slot × No. 372169.90020%33.980

43.500 + 33.600 + 33.980= 111.080

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 372, this player's stored replacement finish.

Otto Moore

57.580 composite · No. 513 all-time

Otto Moore's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 341975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate47.00050%23.500
Best 5No. 341975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate55.60030%16.680
Best 10No. 341975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 551969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1001968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1061971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1211974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 17487.00020%17.400

23.500 + 16.680 + 17.400= 57.580

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 174, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1162#513Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better87.047.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better112.055.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better169.987.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#654#613Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.2Better result for this metric.+1.6
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5Better result for this metric.+0.8
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8Better result for this metric.+0.5
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+660 pts+719 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Games632682
Minutes14,88016,893

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
True shooting percentage64.2%Better result for this metric.48.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile63.9%Better result for this metric.48.1%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Field-goal percentage61.4%Better result for this metric.45.3%
Three-point percentage8.3%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage72.5%Better result for this metric.60.9%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.0%Better result for this metric.8.5%
Assists per game1.41.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.2%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.1%Better result for this metric.15.9%
Rebounds per game8.3Better result for this metric.8.2

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.8%1.2%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.8%Better result for this metric.2.6%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Ivica Zubac and Otto Moore
MetricIvica ZubacOtto Moore
Points per game10.5Better result for this metric.8.2

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Otto Moore ranks higher in career impact so far.

Ivica ZubacMetricOtto Moore
#1162Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#513Leads
+2.2LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6
+0.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5
+660 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+719 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Ivica ZubacMetricOtto Moore
490Listed-team regular-season wins855Leads
50.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
250-win team seasons10Leads
060-win team seasons10Leads
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ivica ZubacMetricOtto Moore
6Playoff appearancesNot available
52Playoff gamesNot available
25Team playoff winsNot available
0Finals appearancesNot available
0ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Ivica ZubacMetricOtto Moore
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
1All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Ivica ZubacOtto MoorePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.