hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

J.J. Hickson vs. Walter Dukes: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Walter Dukes ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2092Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#413Leads
+0.1LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6
-1.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2Leads
203.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better44.3Leads
+66 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+180 ptsLeads
281.4Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better60.8Leads

Career Impact Rank places Walter Dukes #413 and J.J. Hickson #2092. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. J.J. Hickson had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/j-j-hickson/walter-dukes/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJ.J. Hickson226.600 · No. 2,092Walter Dukes48.787 · No. 413

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

J.J. Hickson

226.600 composite · No. 2,092 all-time

J.J. Hickson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1312012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2332013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2452009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate203.00050%101.500
Best 5No. 1312012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2332013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2452009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2522011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2862010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate229.40030%68.820
Best 10No. 1312012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2332013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2452009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2522011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2862010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3042008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3222014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 347281.40020%56.280

101.500 + 68.820 + 56.280= 226.600

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 347, this player's stored replacement finish.

Walter Dukes

48.787 composite · No. 413 all-time

Walter Dukes's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 351960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate44.33350%22.167
Best 5No. 351960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.20030%14.460
Best 10No. 351960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521956–57Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 581958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691955–56Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 8160.80020%12.160

22.167 + 14.460 + 12.160= 48.787

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 81, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2092#413Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better203.044.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better229.448.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better281.460.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1553#1229Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Better result for this metric.-0.6
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0-1.0
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5-1.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+66 pts+180 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Games534553
Minutes11,92514,671

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
True shooting percentage53.4%Better result for this metric.45.1%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.5%Better result for this metric.45.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Field-goal percentage50.5%Better result for this metric.36.9%
Three-point percentage0.0%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage61.7%70.0%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.8%Unavailable
Assists per game0.81.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.4%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.7%Unavailable
Rebounds per game6.811.3Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.2%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.1%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: J.J. Hickson and Walter Dukes
MetricJ.J. HicksonWalter Dukes
Points per game9.510.4Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Walter Dukes ranks higher in career impact.

J.J. HicksonMetricWalter Dukes
#2092Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#413Leads
+0.1LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6
-1.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2Leads
+66 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+180 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

J.J. HicksonMetricWalter Dukes
369LeadsListed-team regular-season wins265
46.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage44.0%
2Leads50-win team seasons0
2Leads60-win team seasons0
2Playoff team seasons8Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Walter Dukes leads every available measure below.

J.J. HicksonMetricWalter Dukes
1Playoff appearances7Leads
11Playoff games35Leads
6Team playoff wins14Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

J.J. HicksonMetricWalter Dukes
Not availableAll-Star2
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
J.J. HicksonWalter DukesPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.