hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jabari Parker vs. Lloyd Neal: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Lloyd Neal ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1545Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#778Leads
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Leads
-0.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
124.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better59.3Leads
+232 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+403 ptsLeads
247.0Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better133.1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Lloyd Neal #778 and Jabari Parker #1545. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jabari-parker/lloyd-neal/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJabari Parker157.693 · No. 1,545Lloyd Neal77.947 · No. 778

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jabari Parker

157.693 composite · No. 1,545 all-time

Jabari Parker's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 792016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1242019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1712017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate124.66750%62.333
Best 5No. 792016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1242019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1712017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1922014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2002018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate153.20030%45.960
Best 10No. 792016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1242019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1712017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1922014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2002018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2442015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 365247.00020%49.400

62.333 + 45.960 + 49.400= 157.693

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 365, this player's stored replacement finish.

Lloyd Neal

77.947 composite · No. 778 all-time

Lloyd Neal's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 431977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate59.33350%29.667
Best 5No. 431977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate72.20030%21.660
Best 10No. 431977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2121976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 189.5133.10020%26.620

29.667 + 21.660 + 26.620= 77.947

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 189.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1545#778Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better124.759.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better153.272.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better247.0133.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1128#884Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Better result for this metric.+0.4
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1+0.1Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+232 pts+403 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Games310435
Minutes8,53511,015

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
True shooting percentage55.4%Better result for this metric.51.9%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile55.1%Better result for this metric.52.1%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Field-goal percentage49.4%Better result for this metric.48.5%
Three-point percentage32.6%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage74.3%Better result for this metric.67.2%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.1%Better result for this metric.8.3%
Assists per game2.0Better result for this metric.1.5
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.0%Better result for this metric.13.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.4%15.5%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game5.57.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.0.9%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%2.0%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jabari Parker and Lloyd Neal
MetricJabari ParkerLloyd Neal
Points per game14.1Better result for this metric.11.1

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Lloyd Neal ranks higher in career impact.

Jabari ParkerMetricLloyd Neal
#1545Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#778Leads
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Leads
-0.1Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
+232 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+403 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jabari ParkerMetricLloyd Neal
383Listed-team regular-season wins480Leads
44.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.6%
150-win team seasons5Leads
060-win team seasons4Leads
5LeadsPlayoff team seasons3

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Lloyd Neal leads every available measure below.

Jabari ParkerMetricLloyd Neal
2Playoff appearances2
11Playoff games22Leads
4Team playoff wins16Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jabari ParkerMetricLloyd Neal
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jabari ParkerLloyd NealPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.