Jae Crowder
2012–13 to 2024–25 · 13 seasons
NBA player comparison
Jae Crowder vs. Rick Fox: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Rick Fox ranks higher in career impact
Rick Fox
1991–92 to 2003–04 · 13 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#980Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#839Leads
+2.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1
+1.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0
68.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better61.7Leads
+784 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+767 pts
153.9Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better129.5Leads
Career Impact Rank places Rick Fox #839 and Jae Crowder #980. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Jae Crowder had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJae Crowder92.440 · No. 980Rick Fox81.153 · No. 839
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Jae Crowder
92.440 composite · No. 980 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 372015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 68.000 | 50% | 34.000 |
| Best 5No. 372015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1132019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 92.200 | 30% | 27.660 |
| Best 10No. 372015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1132019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1692020–21No. 1792018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1932021–22No. 2292012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3082017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 153.900 | 20% | 30.780 |
34.000 + 27.660 + 30.780= 92.440
Rick Fox
81.153 composite · No. 839 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 501996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 61.667 | 50% | 30.833 |
| Best 5No. 501996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1152000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 81.400 | 30% | 24.420 |
| Best 10No. 501996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 701995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1152000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1722002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1992001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2051997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 129.500 | 20% | 25.900 |
30.833 + 24.420 + 25.900= 81.153
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #980 | #839Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 68.0 | 61.7Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 92.2 | 81.4Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 153.9 | 129.5Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #569Better result for this metric. | #582 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.6Better result for this metric. | +2.1 |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.6 | +1.6 |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.1Better result for this metric. | +1.0 |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.0 | +0.0 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +784 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +767 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 812 | 930 |
| Minutes | 20,161 | 23,723 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 55.1%Better result for this metric. | 53.8% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 54.9%Better result for this metric. | 53.9% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 41.8% | 45.0%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 34.7% | 34.9%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 77.7%Better result for this metric. | 77.0% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 9.0% | 17.5%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 1.6 | 2.8Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 9.1%Better result for this metric. | 16.1% |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 9.3%Better result for this metric. | 8.5% |
| Rebounds per game | 4.2Better result for this metric. | 3.8 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 2.0% | 2.1%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.1% | 1.1% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jae Crowder | Rick Fox |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 9.3 | 9.6Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Rick Fox ranks higher in career impact.
Jae CrowderMetricRick Fox
#980Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#839Leads
+2.6LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1
+1.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0
+784 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+767 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jae CrowderMetricRick Fox
769LeadsListed-team regular-season wins593
59.9%LeadsListed-team winning percentage57.4%
750-win team seasons7
160-win team seasons2Leads
13LeadsPlayoff team seasons10
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jae CrowderMetricRick Fox
11LeadsPlayoff appearances9
115LeadsPlayoff games111
58Team playoff wins81Leads
2Finals appearances4Leads
0Championships3Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Jae CrowderMetricRick Fox
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Jae CrowderRick FoxPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Jae CrowderNBA seasonRick Fox
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.