hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jamaal Wilkes vs. Scott Wedman: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jamaal Wilkes ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#526LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#690
+1.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6Leads
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6
49.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better56.3
+1,237 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+891 pts
85.2LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better108.5

Career Impact Rank places Jamaal Wilkes #526 and Scott Wedman #690. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Scott Wedman had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jamaal-wilkes/scott-wedman/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJamaal Wilkes58.627 · No. 526Scott Wedman71.287 · No. 690

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jamaal Wilkes

58.627 composite · No. 526 all-time

Jamaal Wilkes's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 461975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate49.33350%24.667
Best 5No. 461975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate56.40030%16.920
Best 10No. 461975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1331982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate85.20020%17.040

24.667 + 16.920 + 17.040= 58.627

Scott Wedman

71.287 composite · No. 690 all-time

Scott Wedman's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 441979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate56.33350%28.167
Best 5No. 441979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 951976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate71.40030%21.420
Best 10No. 441979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 511978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 931975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 951976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1221974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1771985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate108.50020%21.700

28.167 + 21.420 + 21.700= 71.287

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#526Better result for this metric.#690
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better49.3Better result for this metric.56.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better56.4Better result for this metric.71.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better85.2Better result for this metric.108.5
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#361Better result for this metric.#510
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2+1.6Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0Better result for this metric.+0.6
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.3Better result for this metric.-0.3
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,237 ptsBetter result for this metric.+891 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Games828906
Minutes27,27525,927

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
True shooting percentage53.3%Better result for this metric.51.5%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.9%Better result for this metric.51.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Field-goal percentage49.9%Better result for this metric.48.1%
Three-point percentage13.5%33.5%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage75.9%79.4%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.6%Better result for this metric.9.9%
Assists per game2.5Better result for this metric.2.0
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.1%9.2%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.1%Better result for this metric.8.9%
Rebounds per game6.2Better result for this metric.4.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.8%Better result for this metric.1.5%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.5%0.7%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jamaal Wilkes and Scott Wedman
MetricJamaal WilkesScott Wedman
Points per game17.7Better result for this metric.13.2

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jamaal Wilkes ranks higher in career impact.

Jamaal WilkesMetricScott Wedman
#526LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#690
+1.2Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6Leads
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6
+1,237 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+891 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jamaal WilkesMetricScott Wedman
679Listed-team regular-season wins715Leads
1.7%Listed-team winning percentage1.8%Leads
8Leads50-win team seasons7
460-win team seasons5Leads
11LeadsPlayoff team seasons9

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Jamaal Wilkes leads every available measure below.

Jamaal WilkesMetricScott Wedman
10LeadsPlayoff appearances8
113LeadsPlayoff games85
75LeadsTeam playoff wins56
5LeadsFinals appearances3
3LeadsChampionships2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Jamaal Wilkes leads every available measure below.

Jamaal WilkesMetricScott Wedman
3LeadsAll-Star2
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
2LeadsAll-Defense1
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jamaal WilkesScott WedmanPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.