Jarace Walker
2025–26
76 games · 1,953 minutes
NBA player comparison
Jarace Walker vs. Scoot Henderson: 2025–26 season
Regular-season verdict
Scoot Henderson leads in impact for 2025–26
Scoot Henderson ranks ahead of Jarace Walker in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.
Scoot Henderson
2025–26
30 games · 748 minutes
Impact comparison
Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.
-0.9Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Leads
#372Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#313Leads
-1.88Estimated defensive impactSelected-season lineup estimate · points per 100 possessions+0.43Leads
-2.33Estimated offensive impactSelected-season lineup estimate · points per 100 possessions-0.87Leads
1.5%Steal rate1.7%Leads
14.6%LeadsTurnover rateLower is better; compare alongside offensive workload15.9%
20.7%Offensive usage25.0%
54.3%True shooting %55.3%Leads
14.3%Assist rateShare of teammates’ made shots assisted while on court22.8%Leads
10.9%LeadsRebound rateShare of available rebounds collected while on court5.8%
76Games30
1,953Minutes748
Scoot Henderson's estimated impact per 100 possessions was -0.3, compared with -0.9 for Jarace Walker. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 2025–26 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.
Jarace Walker: 76 games and 1,953 minutes. Scoot Henderson: 30 games and 748 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.
Scoot Henderson ended a larger share of his team’s possessions, so the turnover rates are not an equal-workload comparison. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Behind the estimate
Why the model rates them this way
The model starts with each player’s recorded individual stats, then adjusts that estimate using lineup results. The first two rows add up to the final estimate. All figures are points per 100 possessions.
Jarace WalkerMetricScoot Henderson
+0.09LeadsFrom recorded individual stats-0.12
-1.01Adjustment from recent lineup results-0.16Leads
-0.92Final estimated impact-0.28Leads
Lineup evidence: Jarace Walker — 3 seasons; Scoot Henderson — 3 seasons. This adjustment is not necessarily based on the selected season alone.
Offensive and defensive lineup estimates for the selected season
These selected-season estimates account for who played alongside and against each player. Positive means better than average; a positive defensive figure means fewer points allowed. They are separate estimates—not additional points added to the calculation above. They do not measure how much individual teammates improved.
Jarace WalkerMetricScoot Henderson
-2.33Adjusted offensive impact-0.87Leads
-1.88Adjusted defensive impact+0.43Leads
What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.
Full comparison · 2025–26 season
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.9 | -0.3Better result for this metric. |
| Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best | #372 | #313Better result for this metric. |
| From recorded individual stats | +0.09Better result for this metric. | -0.12 |
| Adjustment from recent lineup results | -1.01 | -0.16Better result for this metric. |
Jarace Walker: 3 seasons of lineup evidence. Scoot Henderson: 3 seasons of lineup evidence. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Final estimated impact | -0.92 | -0.28Better result for this metric. |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 76 | 30 |
| Minutes | 1,953 | 748 |
| Offensive usage | 20.7% | 25.0% |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 54.3% | 55.3%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 41.9%Better result for this metric. | 41.8% |
| Three-point percentage | 37.4%Better result for this metric. | 35.2% |
| Free-throw percentage | 74.9% | 84.0%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point attempt rateShare of field-goal attempts taken from three; describes shot selection, not quality | 48.6% | 47.4% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateShare of teammates’ made shots assisted while on court | 14.3% | 22.8%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 2.5 | 3.7Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateLower is better; compare alongside offensive workload | 14.6%Better result for this metric. | 15.9% |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateShare of available rebounds collected while on court | 10.9%Better result for this metric. | 5.8% |
| Rebounds per game | 5.1Better result for this metric. | 2.7 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rate | 1.5% | 1.7%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateShare of opponents’ two-point attempts blocked while on court | 1.1% | 1.1% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 11.6 | 14.2Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Selected-season adjusted lineup estimates
These account for who played alongside and against each player. Positive defense means fewer points allowed. They are separate from the observed results and are not additional points added to the model calculation.
| Metric | Jarace Walker | Scoot Henderson |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted offensive impact | -2.33 | -0.87Better result for this metric. |
| Adjusted defensive impact | -1.88 | +0.43Better result for this metric. |
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.
Regular Season Impact
Scoot Henderson leads in impact for 2025–26.
Jarace WalkerMetricScoot Henderson
-0.9Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Leads
#372Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#313Leads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Jarace Walker leads every available measure below.
Jarace WalkerMetricScoot Henderson
116LeadsListed-team regular-season wins99
47.2%LeadsListed-team winning percentage40.2%
1Leads50-win team seasons0
060-win team seasons0
2LeadsPlayoff team seasons1
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Jarace Walker leads every available measure below.
Jarace WalkerMetricScoot Henderson
2LeadsPlayoff appearances1
21LeadsPlayoff games5
23LeadsTeam playoff wins1
1LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Jarace WalkerMetricScoot Henderson
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.
Selected seasons
Box impact
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.
Jarace WalkerScoot Henderson
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.