hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jeff Ruland vs. Rodney McCray: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Rodney McCray ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#360Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#342Leads
+4.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8
+2.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0
15.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better28.7
+1,000 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,661 ptsLeads
1LeadsTop-10 impact seasons0

Career Impact Rank places Rodney McCray #342 and Jeff Ruland #360. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Jeff Ruland had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jeff-ruland/rodney-mccray/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJeff Ruland43.487 · No. 360Rodney McCray41.873 · No. 342

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jeff Ruland

43.487 composite · No. 360 all-time

Jeff Ruland's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate15.33350%7.667
Best 5No. 101985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate25.80030%7.740
Best 10No. 101985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 381984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 451981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 255140.40020%28.080

7.667 + 7.740 + 28.080= 43.487

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 255, this player's stored replacement finish.

Rodney McCray

41.873 composite · No. 342 all-time

Rodney McCray's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 231986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate28.66750%14.333
Best 5No. 231986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 421987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate37.40030%11.220
Best 10No. 231986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 291984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 421987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 591985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 981988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2571992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate81.60020%16.320

14.333 + 11.220 + 16.320= 41.873

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#360#342Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better15.3Better result for this metric.28.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better25.8Better result for this metric.37.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better140.481.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#457#240Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.4Better result for this metric.+2.8
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.5Better result for this metric.+2.5
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8Better result for this metric.+2.0
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable+0.8
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,000 pts+1,661 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons1Better result for this metric.0

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Games332768
Minutes11,08824,876

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
True shooting percentage61.5%Better result for this metric.55.6%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile61.4%Better result for this metric.54.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Field-goal percentage56.4%Better result for this metric.50.3%
Three-point percentage15.8%26.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage71.8%76.1%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.0%Better result for this metric.14.6%
Assists per game3.03.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile20.7%15.2%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.8%Better result for this metric.11.1%
Rebounds per game10.2Better result for this metric.6.6

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%1.1%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%Better result for this metric.1.1%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jeff Ruland and Rodney McCray
MetricJeff RulandRodney McCray
Points per game17.4Better result for this metric.11.7

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Rodney McCray ranks higher in career impact.

Jeff RulandMetricRodney McCray
#360Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#342Leads
+4.4LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.8
+2.8LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0
+1,000 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,661 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jeff RulandMetricRodney McCray
319Listed-team regular-season wins373Leads
48.6%LeadsListed-team winning percentage45.5%
050-win team seasons2Leads
060-win team seasons0
5Playoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Rodney McCray leads every available measure below.

Jeff RulandMetricRodney McCray
4Playoff appearances5Leads
17Playoff games46Leads
7Team playoff wins36Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jeff RulandMetricRodney McCray
2LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense2Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jeff RulandRodney McCrayPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.