Jeff Teague
2009–10 to 2020–21 · 12 seasons
NBA player comparison
Jeff Teague vs. Kirk Hinrich: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Jeff Teague ranks higher in career impact
Kirk Hinrich
2003–04 to 2015–16 · 13 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#541LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#617
+3.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7
+2.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5
43.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.0
+1,262 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,199 pts
103.9LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better107.9
Career Impact Rank places Jeff Teague #541 and Kirk Hinrich #617. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJeff Teague59.413 · No. 541Kirk Hinrich65.380 · No. 617
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Jeff Teague
59.413 composite · No. 541 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 302014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 522016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 43.667 | 50% | 21.833 |
| Best 5No. 302014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 522016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 782012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 56.000 | 30% | 16.800 |
| Best 10No. 302014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 492015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 522016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 782012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 882010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1092013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1652017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1732018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2242019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 103.900 | 20% | 20.780 |
21.833 + 16.800 + 20.780= 59.413
Kirk Hinrich
65.380 composite · No. 617 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 382006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 48.000 | 50% | 24.000 |
| Best 5No. 382006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1062003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 66.000 | 30% | 19.800 |
| Best 10No. 382006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 602005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 802008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1062003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1232007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1282009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1542013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1562012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1882010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 107.900 | 20% | 21.580 |
24.000 + 19.800 + 21.580= 65.380
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #541Better result for this metric. | #617 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 43.7Better result for this metric. | 48.0 |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 56.0Better result for this metric. | 66.0 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 103.9Better result for this metric. | 107.9 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #353Better result for this metric. | #377 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +3.3Better result for this metric. | +2.7 |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.5Better result for this metric. | +2.1 |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.1Better result for this metric. | +1.5 |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.0Better result for this metric. | +0.6 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +1,262 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +1,199 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 826 | 879 |
| Minutes | 22,164 | 27,015 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 54.9%Better result for this metric. | 51.6% |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 54.9%Better result for this metric. | 51.7% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 44.4%Better result for this metric. | 41.1% |
| Three-point percentage | 36.0% | 37.5%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 84.4%Better result for this metric. | 80.0% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 32.6%Better result for this metric. | 26.7% |
| Assists per game | 5.6Better result for this metric. | 4.8 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 16.4% | 15.0%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 5.1% | 5.5%Better result for this metric. |
| Rebounds per game | 2.4 | 2.9Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 2.1%Better result for this metric. | 1.9% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.1%Better result for this metric. | 0.7% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jeff Teague | Kirk Hinrich |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 12.2Better result for this metric. | 10.9 |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Jeff Teague ranks higher in career impact.
Jeff TeagueMetricKirk Hinrich
#541LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#617
+3.3LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7
+2.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5
+1,262 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,199 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jeff TeagueMetricKirk Hinrich
573Listed-team regular-season wins615Leads
53.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage50.7%
2Leads50-win team seasons1
1Leads60-win team seasons0
11Playoff team seasons11
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jeff TeagueMetricKirk Hinrich
10Playoff appearances11Leads
87LeadsPlayoff games71
46LeadsTeam playoff wins38
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jeff TeagueMetricKirk Hinrich
1LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
0All-Defense1Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Jeff TeagueKirk HinrichPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Jeff TeagueNBA seasonKirk Hinrich
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.