67.9 composite · lower is better
Explore rankings
Player profile · ATL / BOS / IND / MIL / MIN
Jeff Teague
Jeff Teague advanced stats and career rankings
56.0 average league finish
1,262 total value
Bottom line · Career overview
Jeff Teague ranks #1095 all time. Across his three best seasons, his average league finish was #43.7. His full-career value ranks #353, so longevity is a major reason he lands this high. Explore Jeff Teague's advanced stats by season, era-adjusted impact, workload, and historical comparisons.
Career standing
How Jeff Teague ranks all time
These are league placements, not raw scores. Each season is judged against that season's qualified player pool.
Best in the league
Elite finishes
Upper-tier finishes
Standard deviations across scoring seasons
Equal average of Best 3, Prime 5, and Best 10 league finishes. The overlapping windows make this explicitly peak-weighted. Lower is better.
- Best 3 weight
- 63.3%
- Score
- 67.9
- Qualified seasons
- 12
- All-time rank
- #1095
Every season
Jeff Teague advanced stats by season
Era-centered box impact supports comparisons through time. Impact Rate and its rank compare players only within that season.
| Season | Team | Age | GP | MP | Era-centered box impact | Impact Rate | Rate rank | Season Value | Value percentile | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | BOS/MIL | 32 | 55 | 950 | -2.11 | 20.4 | #294 | -2.2 | 21st | Established |
| 2019–20Historical Defense Estimate | ATL/MIN | 31 | 59 | 1,464 | -1.17 | 36.6 | #224 | 26.1 | 42nd | Strong |
| 2018–19Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 30 | 42 | 1,264 | -0.50 | 53.3 | #173 | 39.5 | 54th | Strong |
| 2017–18Historical Defense Estimate | MIN | 29 | 70 | 2,311 | -0.18 | 54.6 | #165 | 83.9 | 68th | Strong |
| 2016–17Historical Defense Estimate | IND | 28 | 82 | 2,657 | +2.12 | 86.0 | #52 | 218.7 | 90th | Strong |
| 2015–16Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 27 | 79 | 2,255 | +2.03 | 86.8 | #49 | 183.9 | 90th | Strong |
| 2014–15Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 26 | 73 | 2,228 | +3.35 | 92.2 | #30 | 233.0 | 93rd | Strong |
| 2013–14Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 25 | 79 | 2,542 | +0.46 | 68.7 | #109 | 123.0 | 78th | Strong |
| 2012–13Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 24 | 80 | 2,628 | +1.10 | 78.0 | #78 | 157.1 | 84th | Strong |
| 2011–12Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 23 | 66 | 2,183 | +1.70 | 79.6 | #71 | 151.7 | 87th | Strong |
| 2010–11Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 22 | 70 | 963 | +0.96 | 75.2 | #88 | 53.0 | 59th | Established |
| 2009–10Historical Defense Estimate | ATL | 21 | 71 | 719 | -2.44 | 16.4 | #282 | -5.9 | 19th | Established |
Career movement
Jeff Teague's career impact by season
Peak +3.35 in 2014–15 · 12 seasons · 22,164 minutes
The same historical box-score model is used for every season, making the career shape comparable through time. This is separate from the current lineup-context ranking.
Career comparison
Compare the shape, not the calendar
Align by NBA experience to compare season one with season one, or by age to compare players at the same stage of life.
NBA season number · fixed impact axis −5 to +15
Similar career arcs
Players with careers similar to Jeff Teague
The score compares era-centered box impact, peak, prime, workload, career length, position, and trajectory aligned by NBA experience. It describes career shape, not playing style or equal ability.
Bobby Jackson
93%career match
88% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2002–03SG · All-Time Career #172Jeff Mullins
93%career match
88% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1968–69PG · All-Time Career #1143Nick Van Exel
92%career match
93% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 1997–98SG · All-Time Career #915Kevin Martin
92%career match
91% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2010–11PG · All-Time Career #987Brevin Knight
92%career match
91% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2004–05PG · All-Time Career #1668Tyus Jones
92%career match
93% season match · 2014–15 ↔ 2023–24Impact Rate shows how strong a player was compared with everyone else that season. Season Value adds how much he played. The career ranking rewards a high peak, a long prime, and repeated seasons near the top. Older seasons use clearly labeled estimates where the NBA did not record today's full set of statistics. Read how every ranking works →