hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jerry Sichting vs. John Paxson: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jerry Sichting ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1398LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1410
+0.2LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
-1.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9Leads
121.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better129.0
+160 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+234 ptsLeads
179.8Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better167.0Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jerry Sichting #1398 and John Paxson #1410. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. John Paxson had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jerry-sichting/john-paxson/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJerry Sichting139.753 · No. 1,398John Paxson141.160 · No. 1,410

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jerry Sichting

139.753 composite · No. 1,398 all-time

Jerry Sichting's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 891983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1321985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1441984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate121.66750%60.833
Best 5No. 891983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1321985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1441984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1751987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate143.20030%42.960
Best 10No. 891983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1321985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1441984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1751987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1761982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2011980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2181986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2321989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 255179.80020%35.960

60.833 + 42.960 + 35.960= 139.753

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 255, this player's stored replacement finish.

John Paxson

141.160 composite · No. 1,410 all-time

John Paxson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1191990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate129.00050%64.500
Best 5No. 1191990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1641988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate144.20030%43.260
Best 10No. 1191990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1451987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1641988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1751984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1831983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2071992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate167.00020%33.400

64.500 + 43.260 + 33.400= 141.160

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1398Better result for this metric.#1410
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better121.7Better result for this metric.129.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better143.2Better result for this metric.144.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better179.8167.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1270#1123Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.2Better result for this metric.-0.1
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5Better result for this metric.-0.6
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0-0.9Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-1.5
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+160 pts+234 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Games598772
Minutes12,73217,257

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
True shooting percentage54.6%54.8%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.9%54.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Field-goal percentage50.7%Better result for this metric.49.9%
Three-point percentage27.1%35.5%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage85.7%Better result for this metric.80.4%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile20.1%22.6%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game3.33.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.8%12.1%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.5%Better result for this metric.3.1%
Rebounds per game1.4Better result for this metric.1.2

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.5%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%0.2%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jerry Sichting and John Paxson
MetricJerry SichtingJohn Paxson
Points per game6.97.2Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jerry Sichting ranks higher in career impact.

Jerry SichtingMetricJohn Paxson
#1398LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1410
+0.2LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
-1.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.9Leads
+160 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+234 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

John Paxson leads every available measure below.

Jerry SichtingMetricJohn Paxson
485Listed-team regular-season wins540Leads
49.3%Listed-team winning percentage59.9%Leads
450-win team seasons6Leads
160-win team seasons2Leads
7Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

John Paxson leads every available measure below.

Jerry SichtingMetricJohn Paxson
5Playoff appearances10Leads
47Playoff games119Leads
29Team playoff wins76Leads
2Finals appearances3Leads
1Championships3Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jerry SichtingMetricJohn Paxson
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jerry SichtingJohn PaxsonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.