hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jim Brewer vs. Kenneth Faried: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jim Brewer ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#507LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1107
+2.0LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9
39.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better79.7
+799 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+594 pts
101.1LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better178.2

Career Impact Rank places Jim Brewer #507 and Kenneth Faried #1107. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jim-brewer/kenneth-faried/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJim Brewer57.153 · No. 507Kenneth Faried104.633 · No. 1,107

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jim Brewer

57.153 composite · No. 507 all-time

Jim Brewer's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 261975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate39.66750%19.833
Best 5No. 261975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1061980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate57.00030%17.100
Best 10No. 261975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1061980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 233101.10020%20.220

19.833 + 17.100 + 20.220= 57.153

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 233, this player's stored replacement finish.

Kenneth Faried

104.633 composite · No. 1,107 all-time

Kenneth Faried's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 692013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 742011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate79.66750%39.833
Best 5No. 692013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 742011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1212012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1262016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate97.20030%29.160
Best 10No. 692013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 742011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 962015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1212012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1262016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1362014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1562018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2762017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 364178.20020%35.640

39.833 + 29.160 + 35.640= 104.633

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 364, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#507Better result for this metric.#1107
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better39.7Better result for this metric.79.7
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better57.0Better result for this metric.97.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better101.1Better result for this metric.178.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#561Better result for this metric.#700
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.0Better result for this metric.+1.6
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Better result for this metric.+1.2
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0Better result for this metric.+0.9
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+799 ptsBetter result for this metric.+594 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Games703478
Minutes15,93611,728

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
True shooting percentage46.7%57.7%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile46.8%58.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Field-goal percentage44.8%54.6%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage7.7%22.2%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage57.1%65.4%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.1%Better result for this metric.6.3%
Assists per game1.5Better result for this metric.1.0
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.1%11.6%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.5%18.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game6.38.1Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.4%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.9%2.7%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jim Brewer and Kenneth Faried
MetricJim BrewerKenneth Faried
Points per game5.811.4Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Brewer ranks higher in career impact.

Jim BrewerMetricKenneth Faried
#507LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1107
+2.0LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9
+799 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+594 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jim BrewerMetricKenneth Faried
541LeadsListed-team regular-season wins375
0.9%Listed-team winning percentage51.9%Leads
5Leads50-win team seasons2
3Leads60-win team seasons0
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons4

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Jim Brewer leads every available measure below.

Jim BrewerMetricKenneth Faried
6LeadsPlayoff appearances3
31LeadsPlayoff games18
21LeadsTeam playoff wins11
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jim BrewerMetricKenneth Faried
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
2All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jim BrewerKenneth FariedPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.