Jim Brewer
1973–74 to 1981–82 · 9 seasons
NBA player comparison
Jim Brewer vs. Larry Kenon: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Jim Brewer ranks higher in career impact
Larry Kenon
1976–77 to 1982–83 · 7 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#507LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#724
+2.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Leads
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6
39.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better37.0Leads
+799 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+821 ptsLeads
101.1LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better155.9
Career Impact Rank places Jim Brewer #507 and Larry Kenon #724. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Larry Kenon had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJim Brewer57.153 · No. 507Larry Kenon73.740 · No. 724
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Jim Brewer
57.153 composite · No. 507 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 261975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 39.667 | 50% | 19.833 |
| Best 5No. 261975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1061980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 57.000 | 30% | 17.100 |
| Best 10No. 261975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1061980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1101977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1361978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 233 | 101.100 | 20% | 20.220 |
19.833 + 17.100 + 20.220= 57.153
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 233, this player's stored replacement finish.
Larry Kenon
73.740 composite · No. 724 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 201976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 37.000 | 50% | 18.500 |
| Best 5No. 201976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1241979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1661982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 80.200 | 30% | 24.060 |
| Best 10No. 201976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 241978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1241979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1661982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1851980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2381981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 245 | 155.900 | 20% | 31.180 |
18.500 + 24.060 + 31.180= 73.740
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 245, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #507Better result for this metric. | #724 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 39.7 | 37.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 57.0Better result for this metric. | 80.2 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 101.1Better result for this metric. | 155.9 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #561 | #543Better result for this metric. |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.0 | +2.7Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.4 | +1.8Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.0Better result for this metric. | +0.6 |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +799 pts | +821 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 703 | 503 |
| Minutes | 15,936 | 15,517 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 46.7% | 52.9%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 46.8% | 51.9%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 44.8% | 48.9%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 7.7% | 10.0%Better result for this metric. |
| Free-throw percentage | 57.1% | 79.8%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 8.1% | 10.9%Better result for this metric. |
| Assists per game | 1.5 | 2.6Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 19.1% | 14.5%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 14.5%Better result for this metric. | 12.8% |
| Rebounds per game | 6.3 | 7.8Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.7% | 1.8%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 1.9%Better result for this metric. | 0.5% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jim Brewer | Larry Kenon |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 5.8 | 17.0Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Jim Brewer ranks higher in career impact.
Jim BrewerMetricLarry Kenon
#507LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#724
+2.0Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7Leads
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6
+799 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+821 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jim BrewerMetricLarry Kenon
541LeadsListed-team regular-season wins345
0.9%Listed-team winning percentage46.7%Leads
5Leads50-win team seasons1
3Leads60-win team seasons0
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons5
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Jim Brewer leads every available measure below.
Jim BrewerMetricLarry Kenon
6LeadsPlayoff appearances5
31Playoff games31
21LeadsTeam playoff wins12
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jim BrewerMetricLarry Kenon
0All-Star2Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA0
2LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Jim BrewerLarry KenonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Jim BrewerNBA seasonLarry Kenon
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
No season
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.