Jim Cleamons
1975–76
82 games · 2,835 minutes
NBA player comparison
Jim Cleamons vs. Nate Williams: 1975–76 season
Regular-season verdict
Jim Cleamons leads in impact for 1975–76
Jim Cleamons ranks ahead of Nate Williams in estimated impact while playing. This compares regular-season performance, not total contribution across the season.
Nate Williams
1975–76
81 games · 1,935 minutes
Impact comparison
Impact estimate is measured in points per 100 possessions above league average. Zero is average; higher is better. Impact Rate rank is a league place, not a 0–100 score: No. 1 is best.
+1.1LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
#44LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#71
82Games81
2,835Minutes1,935
12.2PPG12.8Leads
50.9%LeadsTS%49.3%
Jim Cleamons's estimated impact per 100 possessions was +1.1, compared with -0.1 for Nate Williams. This compares their impact while playing, not their total contribution across the season. Both players are compared in the 1975–76 season using its published Impact Rate. A ranked comparison requires at least 450 minutes for each player.
Jim Cleamons: 82 games and 2,835 minutes. Nate Williams: 81 games and 1,935 minutes. Playing time matters when judging the whole season; the impact estimate above is a rate, not a season total.
Read turnover rate alongside offensive workload. Offensive usage measures the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on the court—not every touch, pass, or act of playmaking. These rows provide context; they are not extra points added to the ranking.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Behind the estimate
Why the model rates them this way
A verified breakdown of this season’s published estimate is unavailable. We do not substitute another season’s calculation.
What this does not establish: these figures do not prove that either player made his teammates shoot better. A verified teammate-shooting comparison is unavailable for this selected season. A small difference in the estimates is not a decisive basketball distinction.
Full comparison · 1975–76 season
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
The impact estimate compares performance while playing, not total contribution over the season. The individual-stat estimate plus the lineup adjustment gives the final estimate.
| Metric | Jim Cleamons | Nate Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Impact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +1.1Better result for this metric. | -0.1 |
| Impact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best | #44Better result for this metric. | #71 |
Jim Cleamons: verified lineup window unavailable. Nate Williams: verified lineup window unavailable. The adjustment is not necessarily based on this season alone.
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Jim Cleamons | Nate Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 82 | 81 |
| Minutes | 2,835 | 1,935 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These figures describe the selected regular seasons. They provide context, not extra points added to the verdict. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Jim Cleamons | Nate Williams |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 50.9%Better result for this metric. | 49.3% |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Jim Cleamons | Nate Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 46.6%Better result for this metric. | 44.4% |
| Three-point percentage | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 79.8% | 82.4%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Jim Cleamons | Nate Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Assists per game | 5.2Better result for this metric. | 1.3 |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Jim Cleamons | Nate Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Rebounds per game | 4.3 | 4.4Better result for this metric. |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Jim Cleamons | Nate Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 12.2 | 12.8Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Jim Cleamons leads in impact for 1975–76.
Jim CleamonsMetricNate Williams
+1.1LeadsImpact estimateEstimated points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1
#44LeadsImpact Rate rankLeague place · No. 1 is best#71
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Jim CleamonsMetricNate Williams
605Listed-team regular-season wins647Leads
0.6%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.5%
550-win team seasons6Leads
560-win team seasons6Leads
5LeadsPlayoff team seasons1
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Jim CleamonsMetricNate Williams
4Playoff appearancesNot available
27Playoff gamesNot available
20Team playoff winsNot available
1Finals appearancesNot available
1ChampionshipsNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Jim CleamonsMetricNate Williams
0All-StarNot available
0MVPNot available
0All-NBANot available
1All-DefenseNot available
0DPOYNot available
0Rookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Selected seasons
Box impact
Both bars show the same NBA season. Missing or unqualified data does not establish a winner.
Jim CleamonsNate Williams
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average