hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jim Fox vs. Sam Bowie: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jim Fox ranks higher in career impact

Jim Fox

1967–68 to 1976–77 · 10 seasons

Sam Bowie

1984–85 to 1994–95 · 10 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#320LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#900
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8
27.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better66.3
+826 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+645 pts
74.8LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better148.8
+2.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1

Career Impact Rank places Jim Fox #320 and Sam Bowie #900. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jim-fox/sam-bowie/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJim Fox40.147 · No. 320Sam Bowie86.867 · No. 900

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jim Fox

40.147 composite · No. 320 all-time

Jim Fox's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 191970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.33350%13.667
Best 5No. 191970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate38.40030%11.520
Best 10No. 191970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 401972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 471968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1081975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1171971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1571976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate74.80020%14.960

13.667 + 11.520 + 14.960= 40.147

Sam Bowie

86.867 composite · No. 900 all-time

Sam Bowie's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 331984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate66.33350%33.167
Best 5No. 331984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate79.80030%23.940
Best 10No. 331984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 821985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1481992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1601993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1971994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 292148.80020%29.760

33.167 + 23.940 + 29.760= 86.867

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 292, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#320Better result for this metric.#900
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better27.3Better result for this metric.66.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better38.4Better result for this metric.79.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better74.8Better result for this metric.148.8
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#539Better result for this metric.#665
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1+2.1
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.6Better result for this metric.+1.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.0Better result for this metric.+0.8
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+826 ptsBetter result for this metric.+645 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Games743511
Minutes17,29414,098

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
True shooting percentage53.9%Better result for this metric.51.0%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile53.6%Better result for this metric.51.7%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Field-goal percentage47.9%Better result for this metric.45.2%
Three-point percentageUnavailable30.2%
Free-throw percentage77.0%Better result for this metric.74.8%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.1%11.0%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.62.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.0%Better result for this metric.16.3%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.3%Better result for this metric.14.6%
Rebounds per game7.47.5Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%Better result for this metric.0.9%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.8%3.8%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jim Fox and Sam Bowie
MetricJim FoxSam Bowie
Points per game9.310.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Fox ranks higher in career impact.

Jim FoxMetricSam Bowie
#320LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#900
+2.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.1
+1.0LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8
+826 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+645 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jim FoxMetricSam Bowie
1,006LeadsListed-team regular-season wins377
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage46.0%Leads
12Leads50-win team seasons0
12Leads60-win team seasons0
6Playoff team seasons7Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Jim Fox leads every available measure below.

Jim FoxMetricSam Bowie
5Playoff appearances5
30LeadsPlayoff games29
13LeadsTeam playoff wins12
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jim FoxMetricSam Bowie
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jim FoxSam BowiePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.