hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jim Krebs vs. Rick Roberson: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jim Krebs ranks higher in career impact

Jim Krebs

1957–58 to 1963–64 · 7 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#461LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1099
-0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4Leads
48.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better87.0
+64 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+127 ptsLeads
65.8LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better140.8
-1.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5

Career Impact Rank places Jim Krebs #461 and Rick Roberson #1099. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Rick Roberson had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jim-krebs/rick-roberson/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJim Krebs53.047 · No. 461Rick Roberson104.000 · No. 1,099

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jim Krebs

53.047 composite · No. 461 all-time

Jim Krebs's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 371961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.33350%24.167
Best 5No. 371961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate52.40030%15.720
Best 10No. 371961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541960–61Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 571957–58Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 601958–59Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 651959–60Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 851963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 8265.80020%13.160

24.167 + 15.720 + 13.160= 53.047

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 82, this player's stored replacement finish.

Rick Roberson

104.000 composite · No. 1,099 all-time

Rick Roberson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 711971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate87.00050%43.500
Best 5No. 711971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1211973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1571970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate107.80030%32.340
Best 10No. 711971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 911972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1211973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1571970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1831975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 171.5140.80020%28.160

43.500 + 32.340 + 28.160= 104.000

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 171.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#461Better result for this metric.#1099
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.3Better result for this metric.87.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better52.4Better result for this metric.107.8
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better65.8Better result for this metric.140.8
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1561#1352Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7-0.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2-0.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5-1.5
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+64 pts+127 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Games515423
Minutes10,66110,356

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
True shooting percentage44.7%47.6%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile44.8%46.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Field-goal percentage40.5%44.0%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage75.5%Better result for this metric.58.5%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable7.8%
Assists per game0.81.4Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable16.5%
Rebounds per game6.28.3Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.3%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable1.4%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jim Krebs and Rick Roberson
MetricJim KrebsRick Roberson
Points per game8.09.0Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Krebs ranks higher in career impact.

Jim KrebsMetricRick Roberson
#461LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1099
-0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4Leads
-1.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5
+64 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+127 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jim KrebsMetricRick Roberson
262Listed-team regular-season wins574Leads
48.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
250-win team seasons7Leads
060-win team seasons7Leads
6LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Jim Krebs leads every available measure below.

Jim KrebsMetricRick Roberson
6LeadsPlayoff appearances2
62LeadsPlayoff games18
32LeadsTeam playoff wins16
3LeadsFinals appearances1
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jim KrebsMetricRick Roberson
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jim KrebsRick RobersonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.