hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jim Les vs. Winston Garland: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Jim Les ranks higher in career impact

Jim Les

1988–89 to 1994–95 · 7 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1242LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1377
+2.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5
+0.0LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3
#31LeadsBest league finish#81
+147 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+256 ptsLeads
321Games511Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jim Les #1242 and Winston Garland #1377. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Winston Garland had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/jim-les/winston-garland/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJim Les121.087 · No. 1,242Winston Garland137.267 · No. 1,377

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jim Les

121.087 composite · No. 1,242 all-time

Jim Les's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 311992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1041991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate66.33350%33.167
Best 5No. 311992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1041991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2431988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 292146.80030%44.040
Best 10No. 311992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 641990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1041991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2431988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 292219.40020%43.880

33.167 + 44.040 + 43.880= 121.087

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 292, this player's stored replacement finish.

Winston Garland

137.267 composite · No. 1,377 all-time

Winston Garland's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 811988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate111.33350%55.667
Best 5No. 811988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2091992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate136.80030%41.040
Best 10No. 811988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1231987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1411991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2091992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2261994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2451989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 291202.80020%40.560

55.667 + 41.040 + 40.560= 137.267

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 291, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1242Better result for this metric.#1377
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better66.3Better result for this metric.111.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better146.8136.8Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better219.4202.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1305#1089Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5Better result for this metric.+0.5
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.4Better result for this metric.-0.2
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailable-0.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+147 pts+256 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Games321511
Minutes4,22213,391

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
True shooting percentage55.9%Better result for this metric.48.7%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile54.4%Better result for this metric.48.8%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Field-goal percentage39.7%43.0%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage39.6%Better result for this metric.28.1%
Free-throw percentage81.8%83.0%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile30.2%Better result for this metric.25.3%
Assists per game2.94.7Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile21.3%16.8%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.3%5.9%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game1.22.8Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.0%2.3%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%0.4%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jim Les and Winston Garland
MetricJim LesWinston Garland
Points per game3.89.4Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jim Les ranks higher in career impact.

Jim LesMetricWinston Garland
#1242LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1377
+2.5LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7
+147 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+256 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Jim Les leads every available measure below.

Jim LesMetricWinston Garland
285LeadsListed-team regular-season wins261
43.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage39.8%
2Leads50-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons0
3LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Winston Garland leads every available measure below.

Jim LesMetricWinston Garland
1Playoff appearances2Leads
3Playoff games20Leads
0Team playoff wins10Leads
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jim LesMetricWinston Garland
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jim LesWinston GarlandPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.