hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jim Washington vs. Jon McGlocklin: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Jon McGlocklin ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#555Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#535Leads
+0.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Leads
-0.2LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3
52.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better48.3Leads
+669 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+602 pts
81.9LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better84.2

Career Impact Rank places Jon McGlocklin #535 and Jim Washington #555. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Jim Washington had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/jim-washington/jon-mcglocklin/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJim Washington60.620 · No. 555Jon McGlocklin59.127 · No. 535

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jim Washington

60.620 composite · No. 555 all-time

Jim Washington's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 391968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate52.00050%26.000
Best 5No. 391968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate60.80030%18.240
Best 10No. 391968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 731969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 891965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 961971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1001973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1311974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate81.90020%16.380

26.000 + 18.240 + 16.380= 60.620

Jon McGlocklin

59.127 composite · No. 535 all-time

Jon McGlocklin's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 221968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate48.33350%24.167
Best 5No. 221968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate60.40030%18.120
Best 10No. 221968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 691965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 711967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 861966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 881972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 921971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1281974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate84.20020%16.840

24.167 + 18.120 + 16.840= 59.127

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#555#535Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better52.048.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better60.860.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better81.9Better result for this metric.84.2
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#649Better result for this metric.#690
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5+1.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1+0.1
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.2Better result for this metric.-0.3
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0-1.0
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+669 ptsBetter result for this metric.+602 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Games774792
Minutes22,66820,930

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Statistics that were not recorded in earlier eras are left out. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
True shooting percentage49.4%52.2%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.9%51.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Field-goal percentage44.9%48.9%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentageUnavailableUnavailable
Free-throw percentage70.5%84.5%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.4%14.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.42.9Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.2%Better result for this metric.3.7%
Rebounds per game8.6Better result for this metric.2.4

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.9%1.1%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%Better result for this metric.0.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jim Washington and Jon McGlocklin
MetricJim WashingtonJon McGlocklin
Points per game10.611.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jon McGlocklin ranks higher in career impact.

Jim WashingtonMetricJon McGlocklin
#555Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#535Leads
+0.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Leads
-0.2LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3
+669 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+602 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Jim Washington leads every available measure below.

Jim WashingtonMetricJon McGlocklin
1,063LeadsListed-team regular-season wins899
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage0.4%
13Leads50-win team seasons11
13Leads60-win team seasons11
9LeadsPlayoff team seasons8

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jim WashingtonMetricJon McGlocklin
8LeadsPlayoff appearances7
42Playoff games55Leads
18Team playoff wins39Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jim WashingtonMetricJon McGlocklin
Not availableAll-Star1
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense0
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jim WashingtonJon McGlocklinPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.