hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jodie Meeks vs. Luke Kennard: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Jodie Meeks ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1252LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1322
+0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Leads
+0.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6Leads
102.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better113.3
+472 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+541 ptsLeads
188.0Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better175.0Leads

Career Impact Rank places Jodie Meeks #1252 and Luke Kennard #1322. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Luke Kennard had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/jodie-meeks/luke-kennard/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJodie Meeks122.380 · No. 1,252Luke Kennard130.067 · No. 1,322

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jodie Meeks

122.380 composite · No. 1,252 all-time

Jodie Meeks's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1012016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1022013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1032010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate102.00050%51.000
Best 5No. 1012016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1022013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1032010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1252014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1322011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate112.60030%33.780
Best 10No. 1012016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1022013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1032010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1252014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1322011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1732009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2152012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2242017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 352.5188.00020%37.600

51.000 + 33.780 + 37.600= 122.380

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 352.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Luke Kennard

130.067 composite · No. 1,322 all-time

Luke Kennard's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 862023–24No. 1152022–23No. 1392021–22113.33350%56.667
Best 5No. 862023–24No. 1152022–23No. 1392021–22No. 1462024–25No. 1542019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate128.00030%38.400
Best 10No. 862023–24No. 1152022–23No. 1392021–22No. 1462024–25No. 1542019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1552025–26No. 1672017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1722018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2442020–211 open slot × No. 372175.00020%35.000

56.667 + 38.400 + 35.000= 130.067

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 372, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1252Better result for this metric.#1322
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better102.0Better result for this metric.113.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better112.6Better result for this metric.128.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better188.0175.0Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#808#742Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.7+1.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6+0.8Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5+0.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+472 pts+541 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Games539538
Minutes12,11012,440

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
True shooting percentage56.5%61.8%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile55.6%62.0%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Field-goal percentage42.0%46.6%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage37.3%44.2%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage87.9%88.5%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.7%14.4%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.12.3Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.5%Better result for this metric.11.0%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.5%6.5%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.12.8Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%0.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jodie Meeks and Luke Kennard
MetricJodie MeeksLuke Kennard
Points per game9.39.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Jodie Meeks ranks higher in career impact so far.

Jodie MeeksMetricLuke Kennard
#1252LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1322
+0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Leads
+0.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.6Leads
+472 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+541 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Luke Kennard leads every available measure below.

Jodie MeeksMetricLuke Kennard
427Listed-team regular-season wins458Leads
48.2%Listed-team winning percentage52.3%Leads
150-win team seasons2Leads
060-win team seasons0
7Playoff team seasons7

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jodie MeeksMetricLuke Kennard
5Playoff appearances5
34Playoff games38Leads
24LeadsTeam playoff wins16
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jodie MeeksMetricLuke Kennard
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jodie MeeksLuke KennardPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.