hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Joe Dumars vs. Steve Smith: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Steve Smith ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#563Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#462Leads
+1.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Leads
50.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better47.0Leads
+1,516 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,529 ptsLeads
84.5Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better72.1Leads
+2.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5

Career Impact Rank places Steve Smith #462 and Joe Dumars #563. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Joe Dumars had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/joe-dumars/steve-smith/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJoe Dumars61.027 · No. 563Steve Smith53.340 · No. 462

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Joe Dumars

61.027 composite · No. 563 all-time

Joe Dumars's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 321992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate50.33350%25.167
Best 5No. 321992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate63.20030%18.960
Best 10No. 321992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 561990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 631989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 781998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 991996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1011991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1131997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1291995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate84.50020%16.900

25.167 + 18.960 + 16.900= 61.027

Steve Smith

53.340 composite · No. 462 all-time

Steve Smith's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 431998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate47.00050%23.500
Best 5No. 431998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate51.40030%15.420
Best 10No. 431998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 521993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 541999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 621997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 741996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 881995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1052000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1142004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate72.10020%14.420

23.500 + 15.420 + 14.420= 53.340

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#563#462Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better50.347.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better63.251.4Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better84.572.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#273#267Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5+2.5
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.8+2.1Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.5+1.9Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9+1.3Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,516 pts+1,529 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Games1,018942
Minutes35,13928,855

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
True shooting percentage55.4%55.6%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile56.1%Better result for this metric.55.7%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Field-goal percentage46.0%Better result for this metric.44.0%
Three-point percentage38.2%Better result for this metric.35.8%
Free-throw percentage84.3%84.5%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile20.2%Better result for this metric.18.0%
Assists per game4.5Better result for this metric.3.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.2%Better result for this metric.12.0%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.6%6.3%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game2.23.2Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.2%1.3%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%0.7%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Joe Dumars and Steve Smith
MetricJoe DumarsSteve Smith
Points per game16.1Better result for this metric.14.3

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Steve Smith ranks higher in career impact.

Joe DumarsMetricSteve Smith
#563Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#462Leads
+2.5Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.5
+1.5Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.9Leads
+1,516 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,529 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Steve Smith leads every available measure below.

Joe DumarsMetricSteve Smith
626Listed-team regular-season wins718Leads
56.1%Listed-team winning percentage56.1%
650-win team seasons7Leads
160-win team seasons1
10Playoff team seasons13Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Joe DumarsMetricSteve Smith
10Playoff appearances13Leads
112LeadsPlayoff games90
68LeadsTeam playoff wins58
3LeadsFinals appearances1
2LeadsChampionships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

Joe Dumars leads every available measure below.

Joe DumarsMetricSteve Smith
6LeadsAll-Star1
0MVP0
3LeadsAll-NBA0
5LeadsAll-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Joe DumarsSteve SmithPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.