hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Joe Kopicki vs. Linton Townes: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Joe Kopicki ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1958LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2288
+0.0LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.2
+0.0LeadsAverage box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.2
#99LeadsBest league finish#226
+32 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-18 pts
118LeadsGames60

Career Impact Rank places Joe Kopicki #1958 and Linton Townes #2288. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/joe-kopicki/linton-townes/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJoe Kopicki212.753 · No. 1,958Linton Townes247.847 · No. 2,288

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Joe Kopicki

212.753 composite · No. 1,958 all-time

Joe Kopicki's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 991983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 250199.66750%99.833
Best 5No. 991983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 250219.80030%65.940
Best 10No. 991983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9 open slots × No. 250234.90020%46.980

99.833 + 65.940 + 46.980= 212.753

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 250, this player's stored replacement finish.

Linton Townes

247.847 composite · No. 2,288 all-time

Linton Townes's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 2261982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 255245.33350%122.667
Best 5No. 2261982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 255249.20030%74.760
Best 10No. 2261982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate9 open slots × No. 255252.10020%50.420

122.667 + 74.760 + 50.420= 247.847

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 255, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1958Better result for this metric.#2288
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better199.7Better result for this metric.245.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better219.8Better result for this metric.249.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better234.9Better result for this metric.252.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1738Better result for this metric.#3293
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.0Better result for this metric.-3.2
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+32 ptsBetter result for this metric.-18 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Games11860
Minutes1,187543

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
True shooting percentage59.7%Better result for this metric.48.4%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile60.7%Better result for this metric.49.3%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Field-goal percentage49.3%Better result for this metric.44.0%
Three-point percentage27.3%36.0%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage81.2%Better result for this metric.75.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile9.1%Better result for this metric.8.9%
Assists per game0.7Better result for this metric.0.5
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.7%11.6%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.3%Better result for this metric.7.1%
Rebounds per game2.7Better result for this metric.1.1

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%1.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%0.5%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Joe Kopicki and Linton Townes
MetricJoe KopickiLinton Townes
Points per game3.74.3Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Joe Kopicki ranks higher in career impact.

Joe KopickiMetricLinton Townes
#1958LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2288
+0.0LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-3.2
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
+32 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-18 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Joe KopickiMetricLinton Townes
129Listed-team regular-season wins167Leads
52.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage50.9%
150-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons0
2Playoff team seasons3Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Joe Kopicki leads every available measure below.

Joe KopickiMetricLinton Townes
2Playoff appearances2
10LeadsPlayoff games8
9LeadsTeam playoff wins5
0Finals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Joe KopickiMetricLinton Townes
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Joe KopickiLinton TownesPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.