hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

John Battle vs. Mark Radford: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1683Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank—
-0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better—
-2.6Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better—
#125Best league finish—
-103 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-11 ptsLeads
612LeadsGames97

Career Impact Rank is unavailable for at least one player in this scope. hussEyquation does not substitute a different measure or declare a winner.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/john-battle/mark-radford/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJohn Battle174.007 · No. 1,683Mark RadfordUnavailable

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

John Battle

174.007 composite · No. 1,683 all-time

John Battle's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1251987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate155.33350%77.667
Best 5No. 1251987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2171985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate173.40030%52.020
Best 10No. 1251987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1701986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1711990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1841988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2171985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2531993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2551989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2701991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2821992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 289221.60020%44.320

77.667 + 52.020 + 44.320= 174.007

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 289, this player's stored replacement finish.

Mark Radford

Career Composite unavailable

An official score cannot be shown because the stored rank or required source inputs are unavailable.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1683Unavailable
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better155.3Unavailable
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better173.4Unavailable
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better221.6Unavailable
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4525#2848Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.7Unavailable
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2Unavailable
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7Unavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-103 pts-11 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Games61297
Minutes10,910808

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
True shooting percentage52.6%Better result for this metric.51.9%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.2%Unavailable
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Field-goal percentage46.4%50.7%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage27.3%28.6%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage79.3%Better result for this metric.45.8%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.3%Unavailable
Assists per game2.1Better result for this metric.1.7
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile11.7%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.2%Unavailable
Rebounds per game1.3Better result for this metric.0.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.3%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.3%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: John Battle and Mark Radford
MetricJohn BattleMark Radford
Points per game8.7Better result for this metric.3.6

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader.

John BattleMetricMark Radford
#1683Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rankNot available
-0.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
-1.7Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
-103 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-11 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

John BattleMetricMark Radford
494LeadsListed-team regular-season wins100
60.2%Listed-team winning percentage61.0%Leads
6Leads50-win team seasons1
060-win team seasons0
9LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

John BattleMetricMark Radford
9Playoff appearancesNot available
55Playoff gamesNot available
31Team playoff winsNot available
0Finals appearancesNot available
0ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

John BattleMetricMark Radford
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
John BattleMark RadfordPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.