hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

John Wall vs. Nate McMillan: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Nate McMillan ranks higher in career impact

Illustrated portrait of NBA player John Wall

John Wall

2010–11 to 2022–23 · 11 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#205Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#142Leads
+4.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2Leads
+3.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7
18.0Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better14.7Leads
+2,046 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+1,980 pts
58.3Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better27.4Leads

Career Impact Rank places Nate McMillan #142 and John Wall #205. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. John Wall had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/john-wall/nate-mcmillan/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJohn Wall27.080 · No. 205Nate McMillan18.573 · No. 142

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

John Wall

27.080 composite · No. 205 all-time

John Wall's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 92012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate18.00050%9.000
Best 5No. 92012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 282014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate21.40030%6.420
Best 10No. 92012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 222016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 252013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 282014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 362017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 812011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 882018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1222010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1492020–2158.30020%11.660

9.000 + 6.420 + 11.660= 27.080

Nate McMillan

18.573 composite · No. 142 all-time

Nate McMillan's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 101993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate14.66750%7.333
Best 5No. 101993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate19.20030%5.760
Best 10No. 101993–94Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 161987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 181992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251996–97Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 271994–95Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321995–96Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 351991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 491990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate27.40020%5.480

7.333 + 5.760 + 5.480= 18.573

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#205#142Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better18.014.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better21.419.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better58.327.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#171Better result for this metric.#185
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.6+5.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+4.2Better result for this metric.+4.0
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.9Better result for this metric.+3.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.6+3.0Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,046 ptsBetter result for this metric.+1,980 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons11

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Games647796
Minutes22,58820,462

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
True shooting percentage51.7%Better result for this metric.50.8%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.6%Better result for this metric.51.0%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Field-goal percentage43.0%44.3%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage32.2%34.3%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage77.6%Better result for this metric.65.0%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile41.7%Better result for this metric.29.8%
Assists per game8.9Better result for this metric.6.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.0%Better result for this metric.23.4%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.6%9.1%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.2Better result for this metric.4.0

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%3.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.1%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: John Wall and Nate McMillan
MetricJohn WallNate McMillan
Points per game18.7Better result for this metric.5.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Nate McMillan ranks higher in career impact.

John WallMetricNate McMillan
#205Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#142Leads
+4.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.2Leads
+3.9LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.7
+2,046 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+1,980 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Nate McMillan leads every available measure below.

John WallMetricNate McMillan
388Listed-team regular-season wins616Leads
44.3%Listed-team winning percentage62.6%Leads
050-win team seasons6Leads
060-win team seasons3Leads
5Playoff team seasons11Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Nate McMillan leads every available measure below.

John WallMetricNate McMillan
4Playoff appearances11Leads
37Playoff games98Leads
21Team playoff wins54Leads
0Finals appearances1Leads
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

John WallMetricNate McMillan
5LeadsAll-Star0
0MVP0
1LeadsAll-NBA0
1All-Defense2Leads
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
John WallNate McMillanPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.