hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jon Brockman vs. Matt Fish: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader

Matt Fish

1994–95 to 1996–97 · 3 seasons

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2819Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank—
-2.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better—
-3.0Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better—
#289Best league finish—
-48 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-26 ptsLeads
150LeadsGames50

Career Impact Rank is unavailable for at least one player in this scope. hussEyquation does not substitute a different measure or declare a winner.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/jon-brockman/matt-fish/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJon Brockman322.560 · No. 2,819Matt FishUnavailable

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jon Brockman

322.560 composite · No. 2,819 all-time

Jon Brockman's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 2892009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3092010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 345.5314.50050%157.250
Best 5No. 2892009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3092010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 345.5326.90030%98.070
Best 10No. 2892009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3092010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8 open slots × No. 345.5336.20020%67.240

157.250 + 98.070 + 67.240= 322.560

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 345.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Matt Fish

Career Composite unavailable

An official score cannot be shown because the stored rank or required source inputs are unavailable.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#2819Unavailable
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better314.5Unavailable
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better326.9Unavailable
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better336.2Unavailable
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4102#3595Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.7Unavailable
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-48 pts-26 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Games15050
Minutes1,570512

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
True shooting percentage53.0%53.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile56.5%Unavailable
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Field-goal percentage48.8%50.0%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage0.0%0.0%
Free-throw percentage61.8%62.5%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile4.5%Unavailable
Assists per game0.30.5Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.8%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.3%Unavailable
Rebounds per game3.1Better result for this metric.2.2

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%Unavailable
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%Unavailable

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jon Brockman and Matt Fish
MetricJon BrockmanMatt Fish
Points per game2.13.5Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

There is not enough comparable regular-season data to name a leader.

Jon BrockmanMetricMatt Fish
#2819Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rankNot available
-2.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
-48 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-26 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Matt Fish leads every available measure below.

Jon BrockmanMetricMatt Fish
91Listed-team regular-season wins204Leads
39.6%Listed-team winning percentage49.8%Leads
050-win team seasons1Leads
060-win team seasons1Leads
0Playoff team seasons3Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jon BrockmanMetricMatt Fish
Not availablePlayoff appearancesNot available
Not availablePlayoff gamesNot available
Not availableTeam playoff winsNot available
Not availableFinals appearancesNot available
Not availableChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jon BrockmanMetricMatt Fish
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jon BrockmanMatt FishPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.