hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Jonathan Kuminga vs. Steve Patterson: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Steve Patterson ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#2304Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1294Leads
-0.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1Leads
-1.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7
225.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better115.7Leads
+104 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+68 pts
315.6Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better152.8Leads

Career Impact Rank places Steve Patterson #1294 and Jonathan Kuminga #2304. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Jonathan Kuminga had more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/jonathan-kuminga/steve-patterson/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJonathan Kuminga249.347 · No. 2,304Steve Patterson126.673 · No. 1,294

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Jonathan Kuminga

249.347 composite · No. 2,304 all-time

Jonathan Kuminga's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1942023–24No. 2382024–25No. 2442025–26225.33350%112.667
Best 5No. 1942023–24No. 2382024–25No. 2442025–26No. 2692022–23No. 2812021–22245.20030%73.560
Best 10No. 1942023–24No. 2382024–25No. 2442025–26No. 2692022–23No. 2812021–225 open slots × No. 386315.60020%63.120

112.667 + 73.560 + 63.120= 249.347

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 386, this player's stored replacement finish.

Steve Patterson

126.673 composite · No. 1,294 all-time

Steve Patterson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 791973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1381971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate115.66750%57.833
Best 5No. 791973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1381971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1511974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate127.60030%38.280
Best 10No. 791973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1381971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1511974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 178152.80020%30.560

57.833 + 38.280 + 30.560= 126.673

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 178, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#2304#1294Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better225.3115.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better245.2127.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better315.6152.8Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1405Better result for this metric.#1544
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.6-0.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0Better result for this metric.-1.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3Better result for this metric.-1.7
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+104 ptsBetter result for this metric.+68 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Games294350
Minutes6,5025,582

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
True shooting percentage58.0%Better result for this metric.42.6%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile57.7%Better result for this metric.41.4%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Field-goal percentage50.2%Better result for this metric.40.3%
Three-point percentage33.2%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage69.9%Better result for this metric.59.4%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.6%Better result for this metric.10.6%
Assists per game1.8Better result for this metric.1.3
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.3%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.7%14.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.24.7Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.4%Better result for this metric.0.9%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.7%Better result for this metric.1.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Jonathan Kuminga and Steve Patterson
MetricJonathan KumingaSteve Patterson
Points per game12.5Better result for this metric.4.4

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Steve Patterson ranks higher in career impact so far.

Jonathan KumingaMetricSteve Patterson
#2304Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#1294Leads
-0.6Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.1Leads
-1.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7
+104 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+68 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Jonathan KumingaMetricSteve Patterson
274Listed-team regular-season wins492Leads
55.7%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
150-win team seasons6Leads
060-win team seasons6Leads
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jonathan KumingaMetricSteve Patterson
4Playoff appearancesNot available
40Playoff gamesNot available
29Team playoff winsNot available
1Finals appearancesNot available
1ChampionshipsNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Jonathan KumingaMetricSteve Patterson
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Jonathan KumingaSteve PattersonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.