hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Julius Erving vs. Karl-Anthony Towns: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · results to date
Regular-season verdict

Julius Erving ranks higher in career impact so far

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#22LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#83
+7.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+8.4Leads
+7.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.0
1.3LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better9.0
2LeadsSeasons ranked No. 10
+4,430 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+3,017 pts

Career Impact Rank places Julius Erving #22 and Karl-Anthony Towns #83. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Karl-Anthony Towns had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · results to datehusseyquation.com/compare/julius-erving/karl-anthony-towns/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedJulius Erving2.967 · No. 22Karl-Anthony Towns12.460 · No. 83

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Julius Erving

2.967 composite · No. 22 all-time

Julius Erving's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 11979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1.33350%0.667
Best 5No. 11979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2.00030%0.600
Best 10No. 11979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 11981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 21980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 31983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 51976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 61978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 81977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 231984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 331985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate8.50020%1.700

0.667 + 0.600 + 1.700= 2.967

Karl-Anthony Towns

12.460 composite · No. 83 all-time

Karl-Anthony Towns's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 32019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 112018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 132020–219.00050%4.500
Best 5No. 32019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 112018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 132020–21No. 132021–22No. 172017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate11.40030%3.420
Best 10No. 32019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 112018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 132020–21No. 132021–22No. 172017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 212016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 232025–26No. 312024–25No. 472015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 482022–2322.70020%4.540

4.500 + 3.420 + 4.540= 12.460

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Career Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#22Better result for this metric.#83
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better1.3Better result for this metric.9.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better2.0Better result for this metric.11.4
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better8.5Better result for this metric.22.7
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#39Better result for this metric.#86
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.9+8.4Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.7Better result for this metric.+6.9
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+7.1Better result for this metric.+6.0
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+5.4Better result for this metric.+4.5
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+4,430 ptsBetter result for this metric.+3,017 pts
Seasons ranked No. 12Better result for this metric.0
Top-five impact seasons6Better result for this metric.1
Top-ten impact seasons8Better result for this metric.1

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Games836720
Minutes28,67724,294

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
True shooting percentage55.8%62.4%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile55.9%62.4%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Field-goal percentage50.7%52.2%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage26.1%39.7%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage77.7%84.0%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.8%Better result for this metric.16.6%
Assists per game3.9Better result for this metric.3.1
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.5%12.9%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile10.6%18.4%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game6.711.1Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.5%Better result for this metric.1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.5%2.9%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Julius Erving and Karl-Anthony Towns
MetricJulius ErvingKarl-Anthony Towns
Points per game22.022.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Career to date. At least one player is active. Every total below stops after the latest completed season in this data; nothing is projected.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Julius Erving ranks higher in career impact so far.

Julius ErvingMetricKarl-Anthony Towns
#22LeadsCareer Impact Rank to datePeak-weighted regular-season rank#83
+7.9Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+8.4Leads
+7.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+6.0
+4,430 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+3,017 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Julius Erving leads every available measure below.

Julius ErvingMetricKarl-Anthony Towns
605LeadsListed-team regular-season wins433
67.1%LeadsListed-team winning percentage49.5%
9Leads50-win team seasons3
2Leads60-win team seasons0
11LeadsPlayoff team seasons6

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Julius Erving leads every available measure below.

Julius ErvingMetricKarl-Anthony Towns
11LeadsPlayoff appearances6
141LeadsPlayoff games69
84LeadsTeam playoff wins39
4LeadsFinals appearances1
1Championships1

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Julius ErvingMetricKarl-Anthony Towns
11LeadsAll-Star6
1LeadsMVP0
7LeadsAll-NBA3
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
0Rookie of the Year1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09. Active-career totals are results to date through the latest completed season in the source.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Julius ErvingKarl-Anthony TownsPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Career to date. Active careers stop at the latest completed season; no future seasons are projected.

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.