hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Keith Erickson vs. Marcus Morris: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Keith Erickson ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#874LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1671
-0.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Leads
-0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Leads
80.7LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better164.3
+270 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+408 ptsLeads
94.9LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better199.5

Career Impact Rank places Keith Erickson #874 and Marcus Morris #1671. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Marcus Morris had the higher single-season impact estimate and more total career value.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/keith-erickson/marcus-morris/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedKeith Erickson84.093 · No. 874Marcus Morris172.347 · No. 1,671

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Keith Erickson

84.093 composite · No. 874 all-time

Keith Erickson's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 771969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate80.66750%40.333
Best 5No. 771969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate82.60030%24.780
Best 10No. 771969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 811975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 841967–68Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 871965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 901973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1031968–69Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1071974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1151970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1211972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate94.90020%18.980

40.333 + 24.780 + 18.980= 84.093

Marcus Morris

172.347 composite · No. 1,671 all-time

Marcus Morris's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1612019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1682017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate164.33350%82.167
Best 5No. 1612019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1682017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1712018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1742014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate167.60030%50.280
Best 10No. 1612019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1642013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1682017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1712018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1742014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1792016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2072015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2222020–21No. 2572021–22No. 2922012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate199.50020%39.900

82.167 + 50.280 + 39.900= 172.347

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#874Better result for this metric.#1671
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better80.7Better result for this metric.164.3
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better82.6Better result for this metric.167.6
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better94.9Better result for this metric.199.5
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1057#874Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3-0.0Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.5-0.2Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.8-0.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3-0.8Better result for this metric.
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+270 pts+408 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Games766832
Minutes18,84122,093

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
True shooting percentage47.5%54.3%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile48.0%54.9%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Field-goal percentage43.5%43.5%
Three-point percentageUnavailable37.7%
Free-throw percentage76.9%77.4%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.5%Better result for this metric.8.7%
Assists per game2.6Better result for this metric.1.5
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profileUnavailable9.1%

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.8%9.2%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game4.5Better result for this metric.4.4

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.6%Better result for this metric.1.2%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.4%0.9%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Keith Erickson and Marcus Morris
MetricKeith EricksonMarcus Morris
Points per game9.512.0Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Keith Erickson ranks higher in career impact.

Keith EricksonMetricMarcus Morris
#874LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1671
-0.3Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0Leads
-0.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Leads
+270 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+408 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Keith EricksonMetricMarcus Morris
933LeadsListed-team regular-season wins674
0.4%Listed-team winning percentage53.5%Leads
11Leads50-win team seasons1
11Leads60-win team seasons0
8Playoff team seasons9Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Keith Erickson leads every available measure below.

Keith EricksonMetricMarcus Morris
7Playoff appearances7
87LeadsPlayoff games76
47LeadsTeam playoff wins39
4LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Keith EricksonMetricMarcus Morris
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Keith EricksonMarcus MorrisPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.