hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Kent Bazemore vs. Mike Riordan: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Mike Riordan ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1531Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#813Leads
+1.2LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4
115.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better62.3Leads
+256 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+374 ptsLeads
242.9Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better123.6Leads

Career Impact Rank places Mike Riordan #813 and Kent Bazemore #1531. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Kent Bazemore had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/kent-bazemore/mike-riordan/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedKent Bazemore156.393 · No. 1,531Mike Riordan79.887 · No. 813

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Kent Bazemore

156.393 composite · No. 1,531 all-time

Kent Bazemore's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 832017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1012015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1632016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate115.66750%57.833
Best 5No. 832017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1012015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1632016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2422018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2442014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate166.60030%49.980
Best 10No. 832017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1012015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1632016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2422018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2442014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2562020–21No. 2762013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3192019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3802021–221 open slot × No. 365242.90020%48.580

57.833 + 49.980 + 48.580= 156.393

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 365, this player's stored replacement finish.

Mike Riordan

79.887 composite · No. 813 all-time

Mike Riordan's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 361972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate62.33350%31.167
Best 5No. 361972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate80.00030%24.000
Best 10No. 361972–73Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 751974–75Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 761969–70Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831973–74Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1301971–72Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1401970–71Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1741975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 174123.60020%24.720

31.167 + 24.000 + 24.720= 79.887

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 174, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1531#813Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better115.762.3Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better166.680.0Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better242.9123.6Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1088#919Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.2Better result for this metric.+0.9
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.5Better result for this metric.+0.3
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3Better result for this metric.-0.4
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+256 pts+374 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Games657639
Minutes13,54615,890

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
True shooting percentage52.1%Better result for this metric.49.8%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.8%Better result for this metric.49.4%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Field-goal percentage41.3%47.0%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage35.6%Unavailable
Free-throw percentage72.4%74.4%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile12.4%12.8%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.82.4Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.9%Unavailable

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile8.2%Better result for this metric.5.5%
Rebounds per game3.2Better result for this metric.2.9

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.3%Better result for this metric.1.4%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.9%Better result for this metric.0.2%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Kent Bazemore and Mike Riordan
MetricKent BazemoreMike Riordan
Points per game8.29.9Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Mike Riordan ranks higher in career impact.

Kent BazemoreMetricMike Riordan
#1531Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#813Leads
+1.2LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.9
-0.3LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.4
+256 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+374 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Kent BazemoreMetricMike Riordan
467Listed-team regular-season wins786Leads
48.8%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.4%
250-win team seasons9Leads
160-win team seasons9Leads
6Playoff team seasons10Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Mike Riordan leads every available measure below.

Kent BazemoreMetricMike Riordan
4Playoff appearances9Leads
41Playoff games84Leads
20Team playoff wins46Leads
0Finals appearances2Leads
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Kent BazemoreMetricMike Riordan
Not availableAll-Star0
Not availableMVP0
Not availableAll-NBA0
Not availableAll-Defense1
Not availableDPOY0
Not availableRookie of the Year0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Kent BazemoreMike RiordanPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.