hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Kevin Stacom vs. Richard Washington: Career comparison

hussEyquationShort-career comparison
Regular-season verdict

Richard Washington ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1826Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1796Leads
-1.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5Leads
-3.0Average box impact to dateEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.1Leads
#131LeadsBest league finish#160
-91 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-66 ptsLeads
347Games351Leads

Career Impact Rank places Richard Washington #1796 and Kevin Stacom #1826. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Short-career comparisonhusseyquation.com/compare/kevin-stacom/richard-washington/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedKevin Stacom193.063 · No. 1,826Richard Washington187.803 · No. 1,796

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Kevin Stacom

193.063 composite · No. 1,826 all-time

Kevin Stacom's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1311975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1941977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate179.66750%89.833
Best 5No. 1311975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1941977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2261978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 233.5199.70030%59.910
Best 10No. 1311975–76Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1941977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2141976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2261978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 233.5216.60020%43.320

89.833 + 59.910 + 43.320= 193.063

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 233.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Richard Washington

187.803 composite · No. 1,796 all-time

Richard Washington's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1601977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1751980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1831979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate172.66750%86.333
Best 5No. 1601977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1751980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1831979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2071976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate1 open slot × No. 241.5193.30030%57.990
Best 10No. 1601977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1751980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1831979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2071976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate6 open slots × No. 241.5217.40020%43.480

86.333 + 57.990 + 43.480= 187.803

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 241.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1826#1796Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better179.7172.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better199.7193.3Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better216.6Better result for this metric.217.4
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4471#4327Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.7-1.5Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.3-1.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-91 pts-66 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Games347351
Minutes4,5397,874

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
True shooting percentage44.9%48.5%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile44.3%48.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Field-goal percentage41.7%45.3%Better result for this metric.
Three-point percentage50.0%Better result for this metric.25.0%
Free-throw percentage76.8%Better result for this metric.71.1%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile16.4%Better result for this metric.7.4%
Assists per game1.5Better result for this metric.1.2
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile14.8%14.0%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile5.6%14.6%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game1.56.3Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.1%1.3%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%2.0%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Kevin Stacom and Richard Washington
MetricKevin StacomRichard Washington
Points per game5.19.8Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Richard Washington ranks higher in career impact.

Kevin StacomMetricRichard Washington
#1826Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1796Leads
-1.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.5Leads
Not availableBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterNot available
-91 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-66 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Kevin StacomMetricRichard Washington
362LeadsListed-team regular-season wins226
0.9%Listed-team winning percentage39.4%Leads
3Leads50-win team seasons0
2Leads60-win team seasons0
4LeadsPlayoff team seasons2

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Kevin Stacom leads every available measure below.

Kevin StacomMetricRichard Washington
3LeadsPlayoff appearances2
26LeadsPlayoff games11
23LeadsTeam playoff wins4
1LeadsFinals appearances0
1LeadsChampionships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Kevin StacomMetricRichard Washington
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Kevin StacomRichard WashingtonPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.