hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Larry Drew vs. Mike James: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Larry Drew ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#988LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1298
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
+0.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0
69.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better86.0
+529 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+305 pts
145.2LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better223.5

Career Impact Rank places Larry Drew #988 and Mike James #1298. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Mike James had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/larry-drew/mike-james-jamesmi01/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedLarry Drew93.120 · No. 988Mike James127.000 · No. 1,298

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Larry Drew

93.120 composite · No. 988 all-time

Larry Drew's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 571983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate69.00050%34.500
Best 5No. 571983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1511987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate98.60030%29.580
Best 10No. 571983–84Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671982–83Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 831981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1351984–85Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1511987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1521985–86Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1541986–87Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2131980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2171989–90Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2231990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate145.20020%29.040

34.500 + 29.580 + 29.040= 93.120

Mike James

127.000 composite · No. 1,298 all-time

Mike James's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 672005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 762004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1152003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate86.00050%43.000
Best 5No. 672005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 762004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1152003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1962002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2012006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate131.00030%39.300
Best 10No. 672005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 762004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1152003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1962002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2012006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2882008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3032007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3212012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 334223.50020%44.700

43.000 + 39.300 + 44.700= 127.000

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 334, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#988Better result for this metric.#1298
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better69.0Better result for this metric.86.0
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better98.6Better result for this metric.131.0
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better145.2Better result for this metric.223.5
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#752Better result for this metric.#1003
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.1+1.3Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8+0.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Better result for this metric.-0.0
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.0Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+529 ptsBetter result for this metric.+305 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Games714595
Minutes18,37014,364

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
True shooting percentage51.7%52.1%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile51.2%Better result for this metric.50.5%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Field-goal percentage46.7%Better result for this metric.41.7%
Three-point percentage29.1%37.9%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage79.8%80.2%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile28.6%Better result for this metric.23.2%
Assists per game5.2Better result for this metric.3.5
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile17.9%13.6%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile3.9%5.4%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game1.82.2Better result for this metric.

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.0%Better result for this metric.1.7%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.1%0.2%Better result for this metric.

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Larry Drew and Mike James
MetricLarry DrewMike James
Points per game11.4Better result for this metric.9.9

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Larry Drew ranks higher in career impact.

Larry DrewMetricMike James
#988LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1298
+1.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+1.3Leads
+0.1LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0
+529 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+305 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Larry DrewMetricMike James
352Listed-team regular-season wins635Leads
42.9%Listed-team winning percentage49.0%Leads
250-win team seasons5Leads
1Leads60-win team seasons0
4Playoff team seasons8Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

The advantages are split across the available measures.

Larry DrewMetricMike James
4LeadsPlayoff appearances3
31Playoff games33Leads
16Team playoff wins26Leads
1Finals appearances1
0Championships1Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Larry DrewMetricMike James
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Larry DrewMike JamesPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.