hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Leon Douglas vs. Mark Landsberger: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Mark Landsberger ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1917Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1776Leads
-2.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2Leads
-2.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.6Leads
200.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better169.0Leads
-242 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value-123 ptsLeads
224.5Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better216.1Leads

Career Impact Rank places Mark Landsberger #1776 and Leon Douglas #1917. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/leon-douglas/mark-landsberger/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedLeon Douglas207.167 · No. 1,917Mark Landsberger185.980 · No. 1,776

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Leon Douglas

207.167 composite · No. 1,917 all-time

Leon Douglas's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1951979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2061977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate200.33350%100.167
Best 5No. 1951979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2061977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2111978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2231976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate207.00030%62.100
Best 10No. 1951979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2001980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2061977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2111978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2231976–77Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2441981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 241.5224.50020%44.900

100.167 + 62.100 + 44.900= 207.167

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 241.5, this player's stored replacement finish.

Mark Landsberger

185.980 composite · No. 1,776 all-time

Mark Landsberger's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 1481977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1911978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate169.00050%84.500
Best 5No. 1481977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1911978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2241980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2401981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate194.20030%58.260
Best 10No. 1481977–78Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1681979–80Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1911978–79Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2241980–81Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2401981–82Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate5 open slots × No. 238216.10020%43.220

84.500 + 58.260 + 43.220= 185.980

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 238, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1917#1776Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better200.3169.0Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better207.0194.2Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better224.5216.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#4740#4597Better result for this metric.
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.4-1.2Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.6-1.9Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.8-2.6Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is betterUnavailableUnavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-242 pts-123 ptsBetter result for this metric.
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Games456437
Minutes10,1117,306

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
True shooting percentage52.8%Better result for this metric.49.7%
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile52.7%Better result for this metric.50.3%
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Field-goal percentage49.5%Better result for this metric.48.1%
Three-point percentage0.0%0.0%
Free-throw percentage60.1%Better result for this metric.52.2%

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile6.0%Better result for this metric.4.3%
Assists per game1.1Better result for this metric.0.5
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile19.8%15.5%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile15.5%19.8%Better result for this metric.
Rebounds per game6.5Better result for this metric.6.1

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.9%Better result for this metric.0.8%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile1.8%Better result for this metric.0.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Leon Douglas and Mark Landsberger
MetricLeon DouglasMark Landsberger
Points per game7.9Better result for this metric.5.6

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Mark Landsberger ranks higher in career impact.

Leon DouglasMetricMark Landsberger
#1917Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1776Leads
-2.4Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.2Leads
-2.8Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-2.6Leads
-242 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better-123 ptsLeads

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Mark Landsberger leads every available measure below.

Leon DouglasMetricMark Landsberger
243Listed-team regular-season wins370Leads
42.3%Listed-team winning percentage56.4%Leads
050-win team seasons4Leads
060-win team seasons1Leads
2Playoff team seasons5Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Mark Landsberger leads every available measure below.

Leon DouglasMetricMark Landsberger
2Playoff appearances5Leads
18Playoff games41Leads
8Team playoff wins35Leads
0Finals appearances3Leads
0Championships2Leads

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Leon DouglasMetricMark Landsberger
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Leon DouglasMark LandsbergerPeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.