Mark Jackson
1987–88 to 2003–04 · 17 seasons
NBA player comparison
Mark Jackson vs. Tony Parker: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Mark Jackson ranks higher in career impact
Tony Parker
2001–02 to 2018–19 · 18 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#229LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#266
+3.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.9Leads
+2.6Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.9Leads
25.0LeadsBest 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better25.7
+2,557 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+2,029 pts
46.2LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better56.9
Career Impact Rank places Mark Jackson #229 and Tony Parker #266. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Tony Parker had the higher single-season impact estimate.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMark Jackson30.200 · No. 229Tony Parker34.053 · No. 266
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Mark Jackson
30.200 composite · No. 229 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 221991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 25.000 | 50% | 12.500 |
| Best 5No. 221991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 28.200 | 30% | 8.460 |
| Best 10No. 221991–92Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 251988–89Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 281990–91Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321987–88Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341992–93Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 411999–00Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 671997–98Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 681998–99Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 712000–01Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 742001–02Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 46.200 | 20% | 9.240 |
12.500 + 8.460 + 9.240= 30.200
Tony Parker
34.053 composite · No. 266 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 142008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 372006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 25.667 | 50% | 12.833 |
| Best 5No. 142008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 372006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 412007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 32.800 | 30% | 9.840 |
| Best 10No. 142008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 262012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 372006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 412007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 462005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 572004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 622011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 672010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1012003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1182013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 56.900 | 20% | 11.380 |
12.833 + 9.840 + 11.380= 34.053
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #229Better result for this metric. | #266 |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 25.0Better result for this metric. | 25.7 |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 28.2Better result for this metric. | 32.8 |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 46.2Better result for this metric. | 56.9 |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #124Better result for this metric. | #176 |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +3.1 | +3.9Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.8 | +3.3Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.6 | +2.9Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +2.0 | +2.0 |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +2,557 ptsBetter result for this metric. | +2,029 pts |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 1,296 | 1,254 |
| Minutes | 39,121 | 38,279 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 52.2% | 54.6%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 53.2% | 55.5%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 44.7% | 49.1%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 33.2%Better result for this metric. | 32.4% |
| Free-throw percentage | 77.0%Better result for this metric. | 75.1% |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 40.3%Better result for this metric. | 34.8% |
| Assists per game | 8.0Better result for this metric. | 5.6 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 19.6% | 13.5%Better result for this metric. |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 7.4%Better result for this metric. | 5.4% |
| Rebounds per game | 3.8Better result for this metric. | 2.7 |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 2.1%Better result for this metric. | 1.5% |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.2% | 0.2% |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Mark Jackson | Tony Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 9.6 | 15.5Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Mark Jackson ranks higher in career impact.
Mark JacksonMetricTony Parker
#229LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#266
+3.1Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.9Leads
+2.6Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.9Leads
+2,557 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+2,029 pts
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
Tony Parker leads every available measure below.
Mark JacksonMetricTony Parker
821Listed-team regular-season wins1,015Leads
53.8%Listed-team winning percentage69.5%Leads
650-win team seasons16Leads
060-win team seasons6Leads
15Playoff team seasons17Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
Tony Parker leads every available measure below.
Mark JacksonMetricTony Parker
14Playoff appearances17Leads
131Playoff games226Leads
66Team playoff wins140Leads
1Finals appearances5Leads
0Championships4Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Mark JacksonMetricTony Parker
1All-Star6Leads
0MVP0
0All-NBA4Leads
0All-Defense0
0DPOY0
1LeadsRookie of the Year0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Mark JacksonTony ParkerPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Mark JacksonNBA seasonTony Parker
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Season 7
Season 8
Season 9
Season 10
Season 11
Season 12
Season 13
Season 14
Season 15
Season 16
Season 17
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.