Marko Jarić
2002–03 to 2008–09 · 7 seasons
NBA player comparison
Marko Jarić vs. Paul Neumann: Career comparison
Regular-season verdict
Paul Neumann ranks higher in career impact
Paul Neumann
1961–62 to 1966–67 · 6 seasons
Impact comparison
Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.
#1421Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#314Leads
+0.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1
-0.2LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3
114.3Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better32.0Leads
+297 ptsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+440 ptsLeads
219.5Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better60.8Leads
Career Impact Rank places Paul Neumann #314 and Marko Jarić #1421. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Marko Jarić had the higher single-season impact estimate.
Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMarko Jarić142.167 · No. 1,421Paul Neumann39.320 · No. 314
Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.
Marko Jarić
142.167 composite · No. 1,421 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 952004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1042002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 114.333 | 50% | 57.167 |
| Best 5No. 952004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1042002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1672007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1752003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 137.000 | 30% | 41.100 |
| Best 10No. 952004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1042002–03Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1672007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1752003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2042006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3072008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate3 open slots × No. 333 | 219.500 | 20% | 43.900 |
57.167 + 41.100 + 43.900= 142.167
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 333, this player's stored replacement finish.
Paul Neumann
39.320 composite · No. 314 all-time
| Window and finishes used | Average finish | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best 3No. 301963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 32.000 | 50% | 16.000 |
| Best 5No. 301963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate | 37.200 | 30% | 11.160 |
| Best 10No. 301963–64Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 321965–66Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 341964–65Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 441962–63Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 461966–67Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 481961–62Reconstructed historical estimateIncludes bounded historical defense estimate4 open slots × No. 93.5 | 60.800 | 20% | 12.160 |
16.000 + 11.160 + 12.160= 39.320
Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 93.5, this player's stored replacement finish.
Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →
Full comparison · Career comparison
Understand the numbers
Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.
1 · Ranking evidence
Impact: who ranks higher, and why?
Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank | #1421 | #314Better result for this metric. |
| Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 114.3 | 32.0Better result for this metric. |
| Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 137.0 | 37.2Better result for this metric. |
| Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better | 219.5 | 60.8Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Impact
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement | #1016 | #843Better result for this metric. |
| Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.8Better result for this metric. | +0.1 |
| Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | +0.2Better result for this metric. | -0.0 |
| Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | -0.2Better result for this metric. | -0.3 |
| Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better | Unavailable | Unavailable |
| Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better | +297 pts | +440 ptsBetter result for this metric. |
| Seasons ranked No. 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Top-five impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
| Top-ten impact seasons | 0 | 0 |
2 · Playing time and responsibility
How much did each player take on?
Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 447 | 451 |
| Minutes | 11,246 | 11,003 |
3 · Individual skills
Where does each player have an advantage?
These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.
Shooting
True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| True shooting percentage | 49.0% | 51.2%Better result for this metric. |
| True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 48.4% | 51.3%Better result for this metric. |
Show more stats: Shooting
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Field-goal percentage | 40.4% | 44.2%Better result for this metric. |
| Three-point percentage | 34.4% | Unavailable |
| Free-throw percentage | 73.0% | 79.9%Better result for this metric. |
Passing
Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 22.3%Better result for this metric. | 16.2% |
| Assists per game | 3.6Better result for this metric. | 3.2 |
Show more stats: Passing
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 18.4% | Unavailable |
Rebounding
Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 6.3% | Unavailable |
| Rebounds per game | 2.7 | 2.9Better result for this metric. |
Defense
Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 2.8% | Unavailable |
Show more stats: Defense
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile | 0.9% | Unavailable |
Scoring
Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.
| Metric | Marko Jarić | Paul Neumann |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 7.1 | 11.1Better result for this metric. |
4 · Team context, not ranking inputs
What happened with and without them?
A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.
Four separate questions
Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards
These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.
Regular Season Impact
Paul Neumann ranks higher in career impact.
Marko JarićMetricPaul Neumann
#1421Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#314Leads
+0.8LeadsPeak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1
-0.2LeadsBest 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.3
+297 ptsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+440 ptsLeads
This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.
Team Success
The advantages are split across the available measures.
Marko JarićMetricPaul Neumann
203Listed-team regular-season wins444Leads
35.4%LeadsListed-team winning percentage0.6%
050-win team seasons4Leads
060-win team seasons4Leads
0Playoff team seasons5Leads
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.
Playoff Résumé
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Marko JarićMetricPaul Neumann
Not availablePlayoff appearances4
Not availablePlayoff games29
Not availableTeam playoff wins15
Not availableFinals appearances1
Not availableChampionships0
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.
Awards
No recorded measure separates these careers.
Marko JarićMetricPaul Neumann
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available
Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.
How each context field is counted
- Listed-team regular-season wins
- The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
- Listed-team winning percentage
- Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
- 50- and 60-win team seasons
- Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
- Team seasons reaching playoffs
- Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
- Playoff appearances and games
- Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
- Team playoff wins
- Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
- Finals appearances and championships
- Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
- Awards
- Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.
Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.
Career Shape Explorer
How the careers developed
Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.
Marko JarićPaul NeumannPeak seasonHistorical source qualification
Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average
Season-by-season evidenceRead both careers at the same stage
Every observed season keeps its age, era-centered impact estimate, league rank when qualified, career-stage label, and exact evidence link. A missing career point stays missing.
Marko JarićNBA seasonPaul Neumann
Season 1
Season 2
Season 3
Season 4
Season 5
Season 6
Observed values come from the accepted season comparison record. Historical source qualifications stay attached to affected seasons. Missing means no NBA season exists at that aligned point; it is never interpolated. Missing is not the same as estimated.