hussEyquation
Menu

Explore hussEyquation

NBA player comparison

Marquis Daniels vs. Trey Burke: Career comparison

hussEyquationCareer impact · regular season
Regular-season verdict

Marquis Daniels ranks higher in career impact

Impact comparison

Box impact estimates points per 100 possessions above each season's league average. Higher is better. Career ranks and average league finishes work the other way: lower is better.

#1411LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1492
+2.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
-0.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
111.7Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better105.7Leads
+177 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementCumulative regular-season value+115 pts
209.0LeadsBest 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better246.1

Career Impact Rank places Marquis Daniels #1411 and Trey Burke #1492. It combines league finishes across each player's best three, five, and ten regular seasons, giving the most weight to the best three. Trey Burke had the higher single-season impact estimate.

Regular season only. Impact figures are estimates; small gaps are not exact. Playoffs, awards and titles do not determine the verdict.

Career impact · regular seasonhusseyquation.com/compare/marquis-daniels/trey-burke/career
Career Impact RankSee exactly how both rankings are calculatedMarquis Daniels141.193 · No. 1,411Trey Burke151.013 · No. 1,492

Only the three league-finish windows below determine Career Impact Rank. Career Value and peak impact are separate measures; neither adds points to this calculation. Lower composite scores rank higher.

Marquis Daniels

141.193 composite · No. 1,411 all-time

Marquis Daniels's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 372003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1542004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate111.66750%55.833
Best 5No. 372003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1542004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1552005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2362007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate145.20030%43.560
Best 10No. 372003–04Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1442010–11Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1542004–05Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1552005–06Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2362007–08Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2412006–07Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2522008–09Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2832012–13Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2872011–12Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3012009–10Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate209.00020%41.800

55.833 + 43.560 + 41.800= 141.193

Trey Burke

151.013 composite · No. 1,492 all-time

Trey Burke's Career Composite windows
Window and finishes usedAverage finishWeightContribution
Best 3No. 342017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1312018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1522019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate105.66750%52.833
Best 5No. 342017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1312018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1522019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2292015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2702013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate163.20030%48.960
Best 10No. 342017–18Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1312018–19Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 1522019–20Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2292015–16Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2702013–14Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 2712014–15Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimateNo. 3032020–21No. 3412016–17Recorded box inputsIncludes bounded historical defense estimate2 open slots × No. 365246.10020%49.220

52.833 + 48.960 + 49.220= 151.013

Open-season rule: every unfilled slot uses No. 365, this player's stored replacement finish.

Averages, contributions, and totals are displayed to three decimal places. The ranking calculation keeps full source precision. Read the full method →

Share this comparisonChoose a social post or link-preview image.

Full comparison · Career comparison

Understand the numbers

Start with impact, then compare playing time and skills. Team results add context. These are not categories to tally into a winner.

1 · Ranking evidence

Impact: who ranks higher, and why?

Career Impact Rank compares entire regular-season careers across NBA history. It combines average league places across the best three, five, and ten seasons, weighted 50%, 30%, and 20%. A lower rank or average place is better.

Impact: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Career Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1411Better result for this metric.#1492
Best 3 average finishAverage league place · lower is better111.7105.7Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average finishAverage league place · lower is better145.2Better result for this metric.163.2
Best 10 average finishAverage league place · lower is better209.0Better result for this metric.246.1
Show more stats: Impact
Impact: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Points-above-replacement rankAll-time rank in estimated regular-season points above replacement#1235Better result for this metric.#1382
Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+2.7+3.1Better result for this metric.
Best 3 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.8+1.1Better result for this metric.
Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-0.0+0.1Better result for this metric.
Best 10 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better-1.3Unavailable
Points above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+177 ptsBetter result for this metric.+115 pts
Seasons ranked No. 100
Top-five impact seasons00
Top-ten impact seasons00

2 · Playing time and responsibility

How much did each player take on?

Read games and minutes alongside impact. Offensive usage is the share of team plays a player ends with a shot, free throws, or a turnover while on court. More usage is not automatically better.

Playing time and workload: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Games548498
Minutes11,70710,401

3 · Individual skills

Where does each player have an advantage?

These are each player's averages across up to ten best seasons. Career Impact Rank gives the Best 3, Best 5, and Best 10 average league finishes 50%, 30%, and 20% window weights, giving the most weight to the highest peak. The model accounts for position, role, pace, playing time, and team results. Green marks the better result for a metric, including lower turnover rates. Workload and shot-selection measures stay neutral. These rows are not votes toward the ranking.

Shooting

True shooting includes two-pointers, three-pointers, and free throws.

Shooting: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
True shooting percentage49.7%50.0%Better result for this metric.
True shootingAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile49.2%51.8%Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Shooting
Shooting: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Field-goal percentage45.1%Better result for this metric.41.0%
Three-point percentage23.5%34.5%Better result for this metric.
Free-throw percentage72.1%81.0%Better result for this metric.

Passing

Assist rate is the share of teammates’ made shots assisted while the player is on court. Read turnovers alongside offensive workload; lower turnover rate is generally better.

Passing: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Assist rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.2%24.0%Better result for this metric.
Assists per game1.83.1Better result for this metric.
Show more stats: Passing
Passing: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Turnover rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile13.0%10.3%Better result for this metric.

Rebounding

Rebound rate is the share of available rebounds collected while on court.

Rebounding: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Rebound rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile7.4%Better result for this metric.4.6%
Rebounds per game2.8Better result for this metric.1.8

Defense

Steals and blocks describe only part of defense. They do not capture every stop, rotation, or matchup.

Defense: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Steal rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile2.2%Better result for this metric.1.4%
Show more stats: Defense
Defense: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Block rateAverage across the best impact seasons selected for the model input profile0.9%Better result for this metric.0.5%

Scoring

Points per game describe scoring volume, not overall impact.

Scoring: Marquis Daniels and Trey Burke
MetricMarquis DanielsTrey Burke
Points per game7.99.6Better result for this metric.

4 · Team context, not ranking inputs

What happened with and without them?

A verified with/without comparison is unavailable for this scope. We do not substitute another season’s observations.

Four separate questions

Impact, winning, playoffs, and awards

These are different ways to understand a career. Only Regular Season Impact determines the hussEyquation verdict. The other three sections add basketball context without adding points or changing the rank.

Ranking result

Regular Season Impact

Marquis Daniels ranks higher in career impact.

Marquis DanielsMetricTrey Burke
#1411LeadsCareer Impact RankPeak-weighted regular-season rank#1492
+2.7Peak box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+3.1Leads
-0.0Best 5 average box impactEra-adjusted points per 100 possessions above league average · higher is better+0.1Leads
+177 ptsLeadsPoints above replacementRegular season · fixed -2.0 replacement baseline · higher is better+115 pts

This is the ranking result. It uses regular-season impact only. Team records, playoffs, and awards do not change it.

Context

Team Success

Marquis Daniels leads every available measure below.

Marquis DanielsMetricTrey Burke
460LeadsListed-team regular-season wins411
57.2%LeadsListed-team winning percentage46.9%
5Leads50-win team seasons1
1Leads60-win team seasons0
7LeadsPlayoff team seasons5

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Final records for every listed team-season. A traded season can include more than one team.

Context

Playoff Résumé

Marquis Daniels leads every available measure below.

Marquis DanielsMetricTrey Burke
6LeadsPlayoff appearances4
65LeadsPlayoff games21
47LeadsTeam playoff wins21
2LeadsFinals appearances0
0Championships0

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Team playoff results count only seasons when the player appeared in a playoff game.

Context

Awards

No recorded measure separates these careers.

Marquis DanielsMetricTrey Burke
Not availableAll-StarNot available
Not availableMVPNot available
Not availableAll-NBANot available
Not availableAll-DefenseNot available
Not availableDPOYNot available
Not availableRookie of the YearNot available

Context only. Not included in Career Impact Rank. Major regular-season honors are recognition, not inputs to the impact ranking.

How each context field is counted
Listed-team regular-season wins
The sum of each listed team's final wins in every season the player represented that team.
Listed-team winning percentage
Those team wins divided by those teams' total regular-season games.
50- and 60-win team seasons
Listed team-seasons that finished with at least 50 or 60 wins. Shortened seasons are not projected to 82 games.
Team seasons reaching playoffs
Listed team-seasons in which that team qualified for the playoffs.
Playoff appearances and games
Postseasons and games in which the player appeared.
Team playoff wins
Team wins from those postseasons. They describe team results, not individual credit.
Finals appearances and championships
Seasons when the player appeared in the playoffs for the finalist or champion.
Awards
Recorded NBA selections and major regular-season honors. A zero means the source records none; Not available means the source field is missing.

Source and scope Basketball Reference, NBA seasons 1950–51 through 2025–26, accessed 2026-10-09.

Career Shape Explorer

How the careers developed

Follow every regular season by NBA experience or age. This view describes the path; it does not create another verdict.

View
Align careers by
Marquis DanielsTrey BurkePeak seasonHistorical source qualification

Estimated points per 100 possessions above that season's league average

S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10

Striped bars mark seasons with fewer than 40 games. A dashed mark means that player had no season at the aligned point.

S means NBA season number; A means player age. Peak labels identify each player's accepted best season. Hover or focus any pair for season detail, or open Season timeline for the complete evidence ledger.